CALDWELL'S TAKE
CORNER CUBE THURSDAY: TNA Impact preview, Torch awards - Match of the Year contenders
Jan 3, 2008 - 6:15:10 PM |
|
By James Caldwell, Torch columnist
Updated throughout the day from the corner cubicle, Torch columnist James Caldwell's weekday blog focuses on hot topic current events and other items of interest from around wrestling.
Updated Thursday, January 3
6:15 p.m. Three days before the Final Resolution PPV to kick off the 2008 PPV season, TNA will run four gauntlet matches on Impact tonight. The matches will presumably shake out the rankings in the World Hvt. division, X Division, Tag division, and Women's division. So, if you're a fan of a bunch of people in the ring all-night-long to water down the competition's Royal Rumble PPV, tonight is your night.
TNAWrestling.com has the list of wrestlers scheduled for the matches. The Heavyweight division gauntlet will feature 14 wrestlers. No word on how Black Reign is depositing his paycheck if Dustin Rhodes doesn't know he exists. Actually, that would make a heck of a TV segment with Rellik peering over Dustin's shoulder as he verifies his account balance to find deposited checks signed "BR" with a tiny paw print from the Arctic Fox.
I digress. Meanwhile, the X Division gauntlet only has six wrestlers booked, including Petey Williams, who has a TNA Hvt. Title shot in his back pocket. Moving along, the Knockouts gauntlet is scheduled for seven participants. The tag gauntlet has five teams of ten wrestlers, including the team that doesn't get along, VKM.
Also scheduled is a follow-up with A.J. Styles as he tries to make a decision on whether he's on Angle or Christian's side. Oh, and there's a TNA Title match at the PPV between Angle and Christian that should get some pub.
***
1:45 p.m. Breaking down the match of the year candidates is an apples vs. oranges comparison. How does a WWE main event-style match compare to a state-of-the-art Ring of Honor contest? Plus, having just written a column for this week's Newsletter on whether we learned anything from the long-term effect of injuries and concussions in 2007, it's difficult to glorify three of ROH's contenders.
The B.J. Whitmer vs. Jimmy Jacobs cage match at ROH's second WrestleMania weekend show, the ladder war on ROH's third PPV between the Briscoes and Steen & Generico (which ROH has since banned), and Bryan Danielson vs. Morishima from Manhattan Mayhem II all deserve consideration. However, in all three matches, the competitors took unprecedented risk by placing their bodies on the line. Jimmy suffered a serious leg injury in the cage match. Danielson's eye was severely injured in the match against Morishima, putting him on the shelf for several weeks. Who knows what the long-term ramifications will be from the matches between the Briscoes and Steen & Generico.
Out of the three contenders from ROH, Whitmer vs. Jacobs was the most amazing live match I've ever seen. The passion from both men in the ring and the passion in the crowd was unlike anything I had ever experienced. But, after the bell sounded to end the match, I paused and asked myself what my cheers were encouraging. More blood? More violence? More potential for injury? I had a mix of joy after watching a great wresting match and guilt over encouraging more bodily harm to the wrestlers in the ring. These are questions we all have to ask ourselves when the risk factor continues to increase, while more information is out there about the potential for long-term damage.
Heavy stuff to think about! On the WWE front, three contenders come to mind. Batista vs. Undertaker at WrestleMania benefited from its place on the card, but the story was the show-stealing action that had the crowd on its feet. It was WWE main event-style done right. Another contender is the four-way WWE Title match at Backlash between champion John Cena, Shawn Michaels, Randy Orton, and Edge. The finishing sequence of that match was put together beautifully to cap off a great main event. But, my match of the year was from six days before that Backlash PPV.
(6) Match of the Year - John Cena vs. Shawn Michaels goes 57 minutes on April 24. From a business perspective, the Cena vs. Michaels classic didn't sell the Backlash PPV as well as WWE would have liked, but the match will stand the test of time as one of top TV matches this decade. It's easy to say Shawn Michaels carried the match, but that wouldn't be accurate. Cena also rose to the occasion and proved to be in tremendous shape to keep pace with Michaels.
The match probably wouldn't have played well in front of the majority of American audiences with short attention spans, but in front of wrestling-hungry fans in the U.K., the energy never subsided from bell-to-bell. The only drawback is, of course, commercials, but the commercials may have helped by providing a breather for viewers at home (instead of watching a three-minute rest hold if this were on PPV) and to build anticipation for each segment of the match.
Tomorrow: Best feud.
Updated Wednesday, January 2
6:55 p.m. In 2006, the best TV show pick was tough because Raw, Smackdown, ECW, and Impact were very consistent. 2007 featured more inconsistency, but Smackdown at least stuck to a basic formula of solid wrestling, some angles, and a strong push for the main event feuds.
Raw was up and down for some months, great for other months, and terrible other months. ECW was fundamentally basic, sometimes drab, and featured a lameduck champion with either Morrison or Punk for most of the year. Impact was, well, it was a show. I'll quickly slide past that. Thus, my top pick for TV show of the year is Smackdown.
(5) Best TV show - Smackdown. There were some moments when Raw was really, really on its game, but the show slipped into the McMahon family therapy hour too often, which took away from the brand's potential throughout the year. Smackdown drifted away from the formula of great matches and angles at the end of the summer and beginning of the fall, but the Hardy vs. MVP feud created at least 20 minutes of must-see TV on Friday nights that kept the show adrift during those stormy months.
Otherwise, the quality of wrestling at the beginning of the year and during the last two months of 2007 made the show stand out above the rest. MVP became a break-out star. Batista vs. Undertaker delivered great main event angles. JBL's color commentary, which will be sorely missed, at least made Smackdown seem like a big deal, and not a "B" show. It was a good year for Smackdown.
Tomorrow: Match of the Year.
***
12:10 p.m. TNA Impact drew a very strong audience for last Thursday's show. That's not an indication that the product is getting any better, because it's not. The audience is just steadfastly loyal to the show, and new or returning viewers are sampling the product.
Some credit has to be given to the exposure from the new TNA video game, which is set for release in a few months. There's assuredly a significant portion of casual wrestling fans who have never heard of TNA, or have only heard a few things about the promotion, but haven't found the weekly TV show.
Fans in the younger male demographic play video games, though. They check out video game websites, where there are sharp trailers for the video game. At the very least, it's enough to create awareness that there is another wrestling promotion besides WWE on TV. It helps that TNA's product caters to that audience with a fast-paced style of action that is different than WWE's more methodical and deliberate offering.
The issue is that people aren't buying the PPVs. In a good month, five percent of the TV audience is ordering a PPV. On the average month, it's about two percent. That doesn't seem to bother anyone in TNA, as they continue to book TV exactly the same - more focus on TV storylines than selling PPV matches. The video game will be a welcome boost to TNA's bottom line, but PPV business is going to stay the same barring drastic changes to the TV product.
***
10:55 a.m. Happy New Year! If you're like me, you're still recovering from great college football to start the day, blow-outs to end the day proving the BCS matchmakers are idiots, and a whole lot of junk food throughout the day.
Going back to Monday night, I thought Raw was a good show to close 2007. Hardy vs. Orton was good. JBL vs. Jericho was good, although the fireworks were a bit much. Flair vs. Hunter has been done so many times before in WWE, but this match-up was unique and simply great. The convergence of Flair's career against Hunter's Rumble spot and his streak of bad luck in big matches made for a fascinating match. That's what pro wrestling is about. It's about big stars in big match-ups with a conflict and something tangible on the line.
With the show already taped, I thought the emotion of the match wouldn't be quite the same as if it were live. In fact, it was the opposite, as the story of the match was so great, even after reading the spoilers beforehand. It helped that the audience was red-hot throughout, the announcers talked up the match like Hall of Famers, and the figure four spot was a memorable scene.
I can probably count on my hand the number of times I haven't been bothered by a non-finish, but the match was too great for a run-in to spoil the match. What made it excusable was that it sets up a myriad of storyline options going forward. What does Hunter do about Regal's interference? Vince McMahon seemingly wanted Flair's career to end, or did he? What is his reaction to Regal choosing to end Hunter's Rumble bid instead of Flair's career?
ECW TV from last night was also a good show. It's a very simple, yet effective show. For the first time in months, C.M. Punk wasn't presented like the lucky guy who just so happened to be holding the ECW Title. At times, it seemed like the longest transitional champion reign in wrestling history.
Last night, they restored an edge to Punk that was missing at the end of 2007. During the opening promo exchange with Chavo, Punk looked more serious and in control of the situation. He wrestled a good match against Chavo in the main event. And, he didn't end up flat on his back with another post-match beating. It's as if a giant weight was removed from his shoulders when his night wouldn't consist of slugging around the ring with the likes of Big Daddy V or Mark Henry.
The tag title situation between Miz & Morrison and Moore & Yang gives ECW a feud unique to the show that viewers can look forward to each week. The 15-minute iron man match next week should be good, considering there will be a sense of urgency throughout the contest and they've had two good tag matches recently.
Send feedback on this article to pwtorch@gmail.com and we'll regularly publish reader feedback in the "Torch Feedback" category on the Main Listing.
For more BREAKING NEWS on WWE, TNA!
VISIT OUR AFFILIATE -
PROWRESTLING.NET
For UFC & MMA NEWS & BLOGS:
VISIT OUR SISTER SITE - MMATORCH.COM
Upgrade to PWTORCH VIP: DETAILS & SIGN-UP INFO
| MORE "CALDWELL'S TAKE" ARTICLES
|
| CALDWELL'S PPV/DVD REVIEW: Dragon Gate USA's "Open the Historic Gate" debut event - Review of whether following DGUSA is worth your time and money |
| CALDWELL'S TUESDAY CHAT w/GREG PARKS: Raw, Smackdown, TNA PPV discussion - MSG crowd, Survivor Series hype, Kofi breaks out, CSI:Miami vs. 30 Rock |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Hitting the hot topics - Raw tonight, Turning Point vs. Survivor Series, Jesse Ventura, Brock Lesnar, Shane McMahon |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Sobering fact on WWE's list of Best/Worst Survivor Series teams - nearly every team with a deceased wrestler |
| CALDWELL'S TUESDAY CHAT w/GREG PARKS: Raw & Smackdown discussion - WWE Title match build-up, Batista-Hardy slugfest, Taker-Jericho on free TV? |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Vince McMahon is officially delusional, plus Vince's hidden message to Stephanie McMahon |
| CALDWELL'S TUESDAY CHAT w/GREG PARKS: Raw & Smackdown discussion - Orton-Kofi build-up compared to Rey-Batista, DX dissension, Sheamus stands out |
| CALDWELL FLASHBACK: TNA Year-End Review 2005 - Must-read flashback to when TNA became a choice for wrestlers in an era very, very similar to 2009 |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Warning sign? Hulk Hogan talks everything but TNA on Larry King tonight |
| CALDWELL: Is Hulk Hogan the piece of the puzzle TNA needs to improve the company's visibility? |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Analyzing Jim Ross's review of the Bragging Rights PPV - younger stars that benefited, Seven-on-Seven analysis |
| CALDWELL: What a fine mess we have here - it's time to bring back Jeff Jarrett to TNA management |
| CALDWELL'S TUESDAY CHAT w/GREG PARKS: Analysis of last night's Raw, Team Smackdown break down, Marine II helping Marine I, Nigel signing with TNA, One Bold Prediction |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Day-after Bound for Glory review - Torch readers pick best match, Foley-Abyss clustermess, Where does Matt Morgan stand? |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: A.J. Styles vs. Sting captured TNA's growing pains in one match |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Texas vs. Oklahoma turns into Batista vs. Big Show; Content coming up tonight |
| CALDWELL: Why would Shane McMahon leave WWE? |
| NEWS BITS BLOG: Jim Ross reviews Raw, Book a match for the Hulkamania Tour, Sting talks BFG PPV and TNA = WCW |
| CALDWELL'S TUESDAY CHAT w/GREG PARKS: Discussion of Raw's illogical offering last night, Smackdown's top storylines |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: If you believe TNA is heading in the right direction creatively, then don't read this blog |
(c) 1999-2009 TDH Communications Inc. - All rights reserved. |