CALDWELL'S TAKE
CORNER CUBE FRIDAY: Breaking down the Maclin vs. WWE lawsuit in Memphis
Jan 11, 2008 - 12:08:08 PM |
|
By James Caldwell, Torch columnist
Updated throughout the day from the corner cubicle, Torch columnist James Caldwell's weekday blog focuses on hot topic current events and other items of interest from around wrestling.
Updated Friday, January 11
12:05 p.m. The Daily News records website out of Memphis has a story on Memphis promoter Corey Maclin filing suit against WWE and Vince McMahon for damages as a result of WWE pulling Jerry Lawler from a show in April 2007. Lawler was advertised to face Hulk Hogan, but he was replaced by Paul Wight (Big Show).
The suit by Maclin seeks punitive damages from WWE and McMahon harming his ability to run a successful wrestling promotion. He cited the loss of an arena deal with Sam's Town casino as an example.
When Lawler pulled out of the April '07 show, the reasoning he gave was that VH-1 cameras would have been filming Hogan in action for Hogan's reality show. Lawler is a contracted WWE announcer, which would have meant some sort of conflict between VH-1 and Universal, parent company of USA Network.
If that was WWE's explanation through Lawler, I think that's silliest thing I've heard from WWE in quite some time. Let's look at this. It's a Memphis wrestling show airing locally. They're going to show a few clips of Hogan interacting with Jerry Lawler outside of a WWE setting. It's not like VH-1 was taking cameras to a WWE-promoted event in Memphis and airing footage of Lawler sitting at the broadcast table.
But, for something specific, let's take it back to the Hogan vs. Randy Orton angle involving Brooke Hogan from July 2006. That aired on NBC's Saturday Night's Main Event, with plugs for Hogan's show. Furthermore, WWE promoted Hogan's show countless times on Raw when Hogan and McMahon were on each other's good side over the past two years. Apparently, the TV plugs didn't represent a conflict of interest between USA and VH-1, but Lawler appearing on a Memphis show with the VH-1 cameras following Hogan was. I'm not buying that.
Attacking the apparent double-standard is Maclin's best line of defense. He gets himself in trouble, though, with a conspiracy theory that WWE and McMahon pulled Lawler because of a "long-running feud with Hogan in an effort to continue its extensive market control of the wrestling market." The problem there is that Hogan and McMahon go from friends to enemies and back again so often, that a judge would simply throw his or her hands in the air trying to figure that one out.
Look at the Raw 15-year anniversary show last month. Hogan put over WWE as the greatest company in the world to work for. Sure didn't sound like there was a "long-running feud" between Hogan and McMahon.
And WWE lawyers would be quicker than a hiccup to roll footage of Hogan on the 15-year special as Exhibit "A" for why Maclin has no case. Maclin could be 99.9 percent right on his claims in the suit, but WWE lawyers will find the 0.1 percent from the "long-running feud" line and spin that in WWE's favor. WWE attorneys make their money with the mindset: "If one aspect of the suit is wrong, then the whole thing must be wrong." Maclin has a strong case, except for recent video evidence against a "long-running feud".
Updated Thursday, January 10
7:00 p.m. Tonight's Impact features a re-match between Knockouts champion Gail Kim and Amazing Kong. From what I read about the PPV last Sunday, they had the best match of the night. That's certainly not surprising. Their feud has been the best, most consistent on Impact for the past two months. It's amazing what kind of inverse relationship has developed between WWE and TNA as far as female talent goes.
Looking at the past three or four months, WWE has turned down the "skank" factor with the divas. My goodness, look at how tame that lingerie pillow fight match was on Raw three nights ago. As far as TNA goes, last week's show wasn't bad, but TNA had the "skank" meter way up high on the Christmas episode with close-up shots of Angelina & Velvet doing their ring entrances.
As far as the female wrestling content, the inverse relationship kicks in where WWE's women's division has fallen apart since the Candice Michelle injury while TNA's aforementioned Gail vs. Kong feud has been great.
In WWE, Women's champ Beth Phoenix may or may not be on the show. #1 contender Mickie James may or may not be treated seriously. The matches may or may not be terrible. (Lately, they have been pretty bad.) I sure hope this is just a case of WWE waiting for Candice Michelle to return and avenge her injury at the hands of Beth. By the way, Candice appeared to be in terrific condition when I saw her Saturday at the PWG show. So, let's hope her return can spark WWE's women's division.
***
6:10 p.m. Today's hot rumor today is about Chris Harris going to WWE. We've placed a few calls and emails today, but we haven't confirmed any rumors that he has signed with WWE. The fact in the story is that his TNA contract is due before the end of the month. He hasn't been used much on TV lately, but he is on tonight's Impact in a match against Judas Mesias. He did not appear on Tuesday's TV taping for the episode to air on January 17.
Purely hypothetically speaking, I think a move to WWE would be in his best interest if WWE is interested in signing him. TNA hasn't shown any desire to push him in a credible fashion for over a year. In St. Louis last April, he was wearing that silly eyepatch the entire weekend at the hotel to maintain the integrity of an eye-injury storyline with James Storm that had well worn out its welcome.
It got to the point where no one cared if he broke kayfabe as long as he just dropped the patch because the storyline had no life. After that, he turned into the guy who complains about everything. It's a one-joke gimmick that TNA hasn't added depth to.
At least in WWE, he could make a name for himself with size and experience. He had a nice singles run during the Wednesday night PPV era, so he doesn't have to be pigeonholed as a tag team wrestler. I'd like to see what he can do as a serious singles wrestler somewhere on national TV, especially if it's not going to be on Thursday nights.
Updated Wednesday, January 9
3:50 p.m. I surely thought there would be some follow-up to Ric Flair's match against Triple H on this week's Raw show, which I brought up in my TV report and in Raw audio with Jamie Penick last night. Thanks to fellow Torch scribe Jon Mezzera, who points out that Flair has apparently been shifted back to Smackdown to feud against MVP. This comes after MVP said he would end Flair's career.
Excuse my enthusiasm to see a follow-up to Ric Flair's latest appearance on Raw, as I missed the boat on the Flair vs. MVP program since the TV that's changing Friday nights is still sitting on the DVR unloved and unwatched. Of course, it would have been nice if the Raw broadcast acknowledged the existence of Smackdown from time-to-time, and by some chance explained why Flair wasn't on Raw this week to reinforce his feud against MVP on Smackdown.
In any event, wwe.com has announced Flair vs. MVP in a singles match at the Royal Rumble with Flair's career on the line. That's a heck of an opportunity for MVP to step up his game inside the ring. If there's one knock against MVP as he's continued to improve, it's that he doesn't have a signature match on his resume other than the Inferno match against Kane. (Mainly because we're still waiting for that Matt Hardy blow-off match.) It's about time MVP has a memorable match to look back on years down the line.
***
11:55 a.m. Ah, ECW. It was a show. Not just any show, but an ECW show. What is an ECW show? Well, it's just an ECW show. The usual cast of characters having the usual matches with the usual finishes with the usual commentary without much unusual about the usual show. In other words, it's just an ECW show.
Every week, it's the same. And every week, I feel good about covering the very predictable and comforting ECW show. Part of the routine on Tuesday nights. Off work at 7:00, eat dinner with my dad while my mom's at Bible study, watch the Rockets, cover ECW, rush to complete Torch Newsletter deadlines, and go to sleep. It's the easiest night of the week.
As part of the routine for ECW on Tuesday night, there was a little bit of C.M. Punk showcasing his skills as champion. There was the usual non-finish to a Punk match, but with the now usual ending of Chavo Guerrero finding some way to lose the match without his shoulders pinned to the mat for three seconds or not crying uncle in submission. There was Miz & Morrison having another decent-to-good tag match with Jimmy Yang & Shannon Moore. There was the usual silly Kelly vs. Layla segment that each week reminds me how much Brooke is missed from Extreme Expose.
But, now, there's Colin Delaney. Soon to be the greatest talent enhancement in the history of wrestling, surpassing greats like Duane Gill and Barry Horowitz. Colin adds a unique flavor to the show. In the patheticness of the character, there is an underlying humor to him. His quiet line about things just not quite going the way he hoped last week against Big Daddy V was priceless. Not even turning around to face Mark Henry when his music hit, as he was still in a state of shock, was even better. It's simply great. Even his subtle reaction to the technical malfunction when the video didn't work was great.
So, now I add the greatness of Colin Delaney to the list of Tuesday night usualness. That is, unless WWE drops the gimmick, like they reduced Santino's mic time. SantinoGate is tough enough to handle, but losing Colin on my Tuesday nights would be too much.
Updated Tuesday, January 8
6:20 p.m. As Wade Keller reported on the main listing, the Raw rating from last night was a subpar 3.2 overall rating. Does it look bad compared to the first week of Raw in previous years? Yes. Should WWE be concerned? Yes. Is there reason to hit the panic button? No.
Looking at Raw last night, it was the first non-holiday (Christmas or NYEve) Raw in three weeks. They weren't up against Monday Night Football, so that should have provided a ratings boost. Unfortunately, there was a college football title game last night. That wasn't the case until the BCS and FOX reformatted the championship game to be scheduled on Monday nights starting with last year's game.
Up against last year's BCS Title game, the Raw rating dropped 0.2 from the previous week. That was from a New Year's Day Raw to a Jan. 8 Raw, which shows how much affect the BCS game had on the Jan. 8 show when a holiday show did better than a regular show. That's usually not the case. (Granted, Kevin Federline was booked on Jan. 1, so that should be taken into consideration.)
Bottom line is that in past years, WWE didn't have to worry about going up against any football during the first week of January unless there was a calendar quirk with a major game occurring on a Monday. The numbers from previous years are going to look better as a result.
The wrestling-related concern is that the first hour of Raw wasn't good. As I wrote about this afternoon, it was a waste of an hour. So, viewers were probably clicking over to football or something else, and didn't bother to return to Raw until the end of the second hour. The Raw Roulette gimmick - which could have been great - gave us a silly Carlito vs. Santino match and a worn-out and tired lingerie pillow fight in the first hour. It wasn't a great use of the gimmick, which was supposed to be drawing viewers to the show.
***
1:05 p.m. Last night's Raw was a good one-hour show. The first hour was pretty much useless other than the video packages, but the second-hour was stellar programming. The rumor going around before Raw was that John Cena was scheduled for some sort of video promo. Fortunately that didn't occur, as I think it would have been a mistake.
Jeff Hardy is the current John Cena. He's ridiculously popular, he pulled off a memorable TV highspot with the Whisper in the Wind off the top of the cage, and his feud against Randy Orton is hot. An appearance by Cena would have served as a distraction from Hardy, who has tremendous momentum right now. WWE has no reason to push Cena out there until he's ready for a full-time return from injury. Hardy is too hot right now as the top babyface in the company.
The big three programs on Raw right now are Hardy vs. Orton, JBL vs. Jericho, and Hunter vs. McMahon's office. JBL vs. Jericho was hot last night. I like the upgrade from Jericho in the facial hair department. Some people just look better with a little growth around the chin. As for the storyline, JBL is such a great heel. Just great. He can barely move in the ring with that Stan Hansen wobble to his walk, but he conveys so much anger from those right hands and facial scowls. I'm assuming bullrope match is coming up at the Rumble or later in the feud, which will allow Jericho to bleed a little and show some fire in a possible victory with JBL getting his comeuppance.
Triple H vs. William Regal was a fine TV match. Regal got to show that he's not just some silly authority figure pushover, but he can fight. Hunter played his role well, but I think it would have meant more in the long-term for Hunter to lose another "big match", then decide it's time to find himself again, which would make that fiery comeback all the more effective. Follow-up is key leading to the Rumble, where we don't even know what Hunter's role will be.
***
10:40 a.m. What a weekend. After taking off Monday to recover from a wild weekend trip of wrestling, more wrestling, barely any sleep, and a red-eye flight home that put me out of commission until Raw, I finally have a chance to put my thoughts down. My first thought is much respect to the wrestlers for the travel schedule they endure 52 weeks out of the year. They're tired. Some are in pain. If they're anything like me, their body clock is thrown way out of whack traveling from city to city and back home again.
I take maybe four or five trips to cover shows per year, and always get sick the second I get home. (My problem is that Houston's weather is the most out-of-whack anywhere in the world. I would put money on that. Everyone here is sick because the winter weather is freezing cold one day, then humid and 80 degrees the next day.)
I digress. Here's a day in the life of a wrestler, just to give everyone an idea of what they go through on a weekly basis. Chris Hero injured his left knee on Sunday during his match against Eddie Kingston. He went to a local hospital to get it checked out, where they fitted him with a knee brace. Only problem is Hero's leg is too big, so even the biggest knee brace they had didn't fit him. So, he's wearing an uncomfortable brace, pain is shooting through his knee, and he has to keep the knee stiff (and unbent) on a plane ride back east later that night. Not exactly a comfortable ride with barely any leg room on a plane.
Now the question becomes how severe the knee injury is. Can he still wrestle? How much time will he need off? How many dates is he going to miss? Fortunately, Hero has insurance, but as one independent wrestler told me a while ago, "If I don't play, there is no pay." It's a bit dramatic, especially if wrestlers save their money for a rainy day, but there is no worker's comp., or union, or formal pool of money for wrestlers to draw from if they're hurt and missing work. (Where's that AFLAC duck when you need it?)
I don't want to turn this into a plea for unions in wrestling because that's not the point. The point that I was reminded of this weekend is that if a wrestler skips a date due to injury, and he's dependent on the date for pay (in other words - no guaranteed money), he's really injured. And wrestlers are pretty much on their own in that situation to tap into their savings account or whatever other source of funds is available to pay bills if they're injured for a time. So, you gain a little more respect for wrestlers putting their bodies on the line in front of 40, 450, or 4,500 fans when the huge risks outweigh the benefit of putting on a great performance in the ring.
I'll have plenty more thoughts on the weekend - big picture and small picture - in this week's Newsletter when I detail more of the trip, my observations, and interaction with the wrestlers. By the way, watching American Gladiators just won't be the same after watching it with 20 hungry wrestlers after Sunday's PWG show when everyone was doing their impression of a Hogan promo and trying to figure out what Mike Adamle and Larry Csonka are up to. And that final obstacle course has more gimmicks than a TNA PPV. Goodness.
Send feedback on this article to pwtorch@gmail.com and we'll regularly publish reader feedback in the "Torch Feedback" category on the Main Listing.
For more BREAKING NEWS on WWE, TNA!
VISIT OUR AFFILIATE -
PROWRESTLING.NET
For UFC & MMA NEWS & BLOGS:
VISIT OUR SISTER SITE - MMATORCH.COM
Upgrade to PWTORCH VIP: DETAILS & SIGN-UP INFO
| MORE "CALDWELL'S TAKE" ARTICLES
|
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Vince McMahon is officially delusional, plus Vince's hidden message to Stephanie McMahon |
| CALDWELL'S TUESDAY CHAT w/GREG PARKS: Raw & Smackdown discussion - Orton-Kofi build-up compared to Rey-Batista, DX dissension, Sheamus stands out |
| CALDWELL FLASHBACK: TNA Year-End Review 2005 - Must-read flashback to when TNA became a choice for wrestlers in an era very, very similar to 2009 |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Warning sign? Hulk Hogan talks everything but TNA on Larry King tonight |
| CALDWELL: Is Hulk Hogan the piece of the puzzle TNA needs to improve the company's visibility? |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Analyzing Jim Ross's review of the Bragging Rights PPV - younger stars that benefited, Seven-on-Seven analysis |
| CALDWELL: What a fine mess we have here - it's time to bring back Jeff Jarrett to TNA management |
| CALDWELL'S TUESDAY CHAT w/GREG PARKS: Analysis of last night's Raw, Team Smackdown break down, Marine II helping Marine I, Nigel signing with TNA, One Bold Prediction |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Day-after Bound for Glory review - Torch readers pick best match, Foley-Abyss clustermess, Where does Matt Morgan stand? |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: A.J. Styles vs. Sting captured TNA's growing pains in one match |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Texas vs. Oklahoma turns into Batista vs. Big Show; Content coming up tonight |
| CALDWELL: Why would Shane McMahon leave WWE? |
| NEWS BITS BLOG: Jim Ross reviews Raw, Book a match for the Hulkamania Tour, Sting talks BFG PPV and TNA = WCW |
| CALDWELL'S TUESDAY CHAT w/GREG PARKS: Discussion of Raw's illogical offering last night, Smackdown's top storylines |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: If you believe TNA is heading in the right direction creatively, then don't read this blog |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: Back from the honeymoon with thoughts on WWE's product and an embarrassing wedding dance video |
| CALDWELL'S ANALYSIS: Does WWE really have a roster depth issue? Part 1 - Examining WWE's 2009 to 2004 rosters |
| CALDWELL'S ANALYSIS: Does WWE really have a roster depth issue? Examining WWE's top stars 5, 10, 15 years ago compared to 2009 |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: TNA should strive for a more realistic product, Impact clips - Samoa Joe's fashion faux pas, new Beautiful Person, A.J. questions Papa Sting |
| CALDWELL'S BLOG: The Rock returning to WWE TV tells Hollywood "it's okay" to associate with WWE |
(c) 1999-2009 TDH Communications Inc. - All rights reserved. |