|
KELLER'S BLOG: Lance Storm spot on in criticism of Fatu and Brother Ray promos from Impact
Oct 25, 2007 - 2:24:01 PM |
By Wade Keller, Torch editor
Updated Wednesday, Oct. 17 - 4:29 p.m.
Lance Storm is 100 percent right in his criticism of two promos on last week's Impact, and I've meant since Impact aired to make a bigger issue of what also outraged me last week. But there was so much to be outraged about regarding Impact, sometimes what would otherwise be the Outrage of the Week slips by without enough attention. Storm's comments deserve highlighting here, because I agree 100 percent with them.
Storm, in a commentary at his StormWrestling.com website (article link), criticizes Junior Fatu and Brother Ray for their comments that demeaned fellow wrestlers.
Storm wrote: "As Rikishi, Jr. Fatu was extremely over and was a very big name, so bringing him in is supposed to give the company more credibility and help elevate those he works with. His promo accomplished the exact opposite. Jr. Fatu cut a promo talking about facing Robert Roode in the Fight For Your Right Tournament. In the promo he didn’t know or care what the tournament was even called, didn’t know what his opponents name was, and continually referred to Roode as a 'jobroni'. If Jr. Fatu doesn’t care that he is in a tournament to win a World Title shot, why should we, and what does that say about the importance of a World Title Shot? Calling Roode a “Jobroni” and screwing up his name is so disrespectful and bad for business, that it isn’t even funny. This promo was a chance for a former Huge WWE star to give a TNA star some credibility, but that is not what happened. Instead we are left to believe that Roode is so unimportant and crappy that people in this industry don’t even know who he is."
Absolutely spot-on right.
Regarding Brother Ray's despicable promo demeaning the X Division, Storm wrote: "We had Team 3D come out and tell us that the MCMG (who are actually getting over) are unimportant and useless, as is the whole X-Division (why they are also burying the X-Div. Is beyond me, they are in the Tag Team Division after all) then they hit the ring and killed the unimportant useless tag team to drive home the fact that everything they just said was true. Even if that was the way it was booked, Brother Rey should have cut a different promo. This segment threw a huge bucket of water on a tag team that was catching fire, in order to get over a team that is about as established and over as a tag team can get. Yet again horrible, horrible business, and thus a bad promo!"
TNA needs leadership. Leadership that can stop these promos from happening. What you have with Ray and Rikishi are veteran wrestlers with WWE TV exposure who are trying to protect their spots by cutting the legs out from under any younger, more athletic act that threatens them. Or, perhaps just as bad, TNA management thinks the way for heelst get heat is to rip on "Internet darlings" like Alex Shelley, Chris Sabin, and the X Division. TNA needs a leader who understands this business and who makes sure counter productive promos like those by Fatu and Ray don't make the air. The motivation is to "protect their spot" and "demean wrestlers who can do things they can't," not help the company paying their salaries succeed.
By the way, it was also utterly disrespectful of Fatu to dismissively reference Rick Rude's name as if he wasn't sure if that was Robert Roode's name. A dead wrestlers' name shouldn't be used flippantly, period.
Updated Wednesday, Oct. 17 - 4:29 p.m.
If Sci-Fi doesn't make it worth WWE's while through either programming fees or a share of advertising, the exposure for WWE with barely over one-third of Raw's typical audience just isn't worth the trouble as it waters down the WWE product in general. There are so few wrestlers on the brand as it is, and WWE doesn't seem to have the creative will to go a completely different direction with the brand, so it just serves little purpose. That's not good news for Joey Styles and Tazz (or maybe one or two of the other four announcers who might be shoved out to make room for Styles or Tazz), but otherwise the wrestlers will likely find a home on Raw or Smackdown (or Heat), and if they don't, they probably weren't long for the ECW brand anyway.
ECW's original concept was to be different enough that it would attract a different demographic and run successfully house shows at smaller venues. Attendance wasn't strong enough to sustain that, and soon they were thrown together with Smackdown house shows. Now that wrestlers are intermixing on TV, there's nothing other than the logo to separate the ECW brand from a Smackdown B-show. The only way ECW had a chance to succeed long-term is by going a different direction with the product than Vince McMahon would, such as giving Paul Heyman total autonomy.
If ECW does remain online for a while, used to drive traffic to the WWE.com website, WWE should get creative and go all-out with a new concept for it. Heck, build toward pay-per-views online only and see if that has any viability at this point. But make the brand look and feel different, not just a red and black version of Heat or a return of Velocity with lip-service being paid to being "extreme."
Updated Tuesday, Oct. 16 - 5:29 p.m.
Today, a PWTorch VIP member brought up in the VIP Forum a potential WrestleMania main event - Triple H vs. Shawn Michaels. That's possible, but I think they're headed a different direction. With John Cena out of the picture, Hunter vs. Cena is off the table for the second year in a row.
With Triple H and Batista crossing paths at the last PPV, I expect that to be the headline match. The top babyfaces on each of the two major brands facing off, with Triple H probably winning the Royal Rumble to earn a shot at either belt and choosing Batista over Orton.
Then, if Orton still holds the WWE Title by then, or loses and regains it, I would anticipate Chris Jericho being his challenger. That may come about through Jericho winning the Rumble, but it makes more sense for Triple H to win the Rumble to create a storyline reason for him shifting brands for the WM24 match.
Then I expect (and would like to see) Undertaker vs. Shawn Michaels. The sample we got at the Royal Rumble earlier this year was spectacular, and having those two legends battle while they can still "go" would be my easy pick for the third of the Big Three matches at the big show.
Updated Wednesday, Oct. 15 - 2:49 p.m.
One of the best reviewed shows of any kind this year for any group was TNA Bound for Glory last night (80 percent of respondents have given it a 7.0 or higher; 24 percent gave it a perfect 10). Coming off two very mixed reviews for the first two editions of the expanded TNA Impact, there's a message there for TNA management.
Their strength lies in their talent delivering in the ring. Their TV show is overbooked, almost a desperate effort to beg viewers not to switch to Raw at that moment, as if Raw was on opposite of them in the midst of the Monday Night War. There is no Raw. There are other shows, but if someone tunes in to Impact, they're not going to leave because Tenay and West stop screaming for three seconds. They're not going to leave if a wrestling match - in a two hour show - manages to last longer than 10 minutes on a regular basis in the same show.
Once TNA bookers top trying to throw in a million storyline advancements and just let things play out, which they did better on PPV than on Impact, the talent can really rise to the occasion.
There were still signs of TNA's negative tendencies. Instead of nine matches, if BFG had seven, this could have been a buzz-creating show of the year. All the three or four best matches needed were five minutes more each to really have the proper time to tell a story. Epic movies need to be well over two hours to be epic. Horror movies need to stop short of 90 minute to not test your patience. A comedy movie can't be 55 minutes and expect people to be satisfied. In other words, different stories need different lengths of time to play out properly. An epic match that people pay for as part of a PPV needs to have more time than TNA typically gives it. Otherwise, you get matches like Daniels vs. Lethal, on the verge of being great, but instead it felt slightly crammed and rushed.
The reader reviews being sent in aren't focusing their praise on the great convoluted finishes "that kept them guessing!" They aren't talking about the great innovative match stipulations like the reverse battle royal or seedings for the contender tournament. They're not talking about the crazy, wild bumps and broken glass and thumb tacks. They're talking about the three or four really good matches.
There is a lesson for TNA in the positive reaction to BFG. Make the TV show more like PPVs. That doesn't mean feature PPV calliber matches all the time - although building to feature-length X Division, tag team, or heavyweight title contender matches would be good. It does mean slow things down, let the wrestlers do their thing, and cut back on the frenetic, densely packed booking. You've got 52 weeks and 104 hours to tell the stories. Don't act like every show is your last.
Updated Wednesday, Oct. 10 - 1:49 p.m.
There are many theories for why Raw ratings dropped to the lowest number since December 1997. The fact that Raw went up against a Dallas Cowboys game on Monday Night Football ("America's Team") and a New York Yankee's deciding playoff game absolutely contributed to the drop in Raw's rating this week. But if WWE decides things are fine otherwise, and it was just a one week fluke because of stiff sports competition, they'd be doing themselves a disservice. This rating is a lesson, a message, a call to action for change.
Look at today's PWTorch Poll that PWTorch contributor Doron Barbalat posted earlier today. Two thirds of those responding chose "Overall disdain for the current product" as their theory for why the ratings dropped, while only six percent called it a one-time aberration. What surprised me is that "no advertised in-ring main event" and "no John Cena" only received 3 and 10 percent of the votes. In other words, PWTorch readers believe this rating is a reflection of the overall quality of the product today.
I agree. I do think the Yankees and Cowboys caused the rating to drop as much as it did; it'd be ridiculous not to consider that as a factor. However, what it revealed is how "soft" Raw's audience is right now. They jump quickly to another option if offered. That wasn't the case when Raw was getting ratings above 5.0 for a few years there - with WCW Nitro as competition. Raw viewers were loyal no matter what else was on.
The decline began with the handling and sadness of the Benoit Family Tragedy, which exposed the dark consequences of the "fun" WWE promoted each week on TV. It continued with a below-par product, a focus on just a few favored names while everyone else was treated like garbage on TV, and a general erosion of roster depth. Then ratings rebounded for the return of Triple H and the McMahon Love Child mystery. When Hornswoggle was revealed to be the long lost love child, ratings crashed. As a non-wrestling fan friend of mine said in reaction to a recent Hornswoggle scene on WWE TV, "I can't imagine any of the wrestling fans I know would be entertained by that kind of thing." WWE has gone in a cutesy direction that is a turnoff to many fans, and they haven't offered enough else to offset those negative feelings. Thus, fans' loyalty is low right now.
It's time for WWE starting with Vince and Stephanie on down to admit that they might need some fresh ideas, it might be time to take some chances and make moves against even their own better instincts, and try to shake up the product. At the same time, they need to start making other moves to plan for one and two and three years from now such as a bigger investment in the developmental system and recruiting - and not just big, muscular guys, but open themselves up to pushing different weight classes in a serious way, as UFC does, and not treat anyone under 5-10 as suitable only for a skit that involves a box of Lucky Charms.
Send me a paragraph with your theory on why Raw ratings have been eroding in recent months. What are the key reasons you and your friends might be less likely to watch Raw as often, and a couple quick ideas on how to turn things around. Keep your responses to 10-15 lines - in other words, not long booking ideas, but rapid-fire short messages that WWE management will have the patience to read and digest.
Email Us Here
Updated Monday, Oct. 8 - 1:42 p.m.
Last night was a huge moment for Triple H. Based on the circumstances, he was put in a difficult position. He was essentially replacing, in the eyes of the fans, either John Cena or Chris Jericho or both. For Cena fans who bought tickets expecting to see Cena vs. Randy Orton, Triple H may have been a letdown. For fans chanting "Y2J," they may have been expecting to be part of the triumphant return of Chris Jericho, so Triple H could have been seen as old news being shoved at them instead.
What happened was a best case scenario for Triple H. After Vince McMahon shut down the hopes of Y2J fans quickly and decisively, Triple H came out to resounding cheers. No mixed reaction like with Cena. No boos because they wanted to see Jericho instead. It would not have shocked me if the crowd was quiet or booed. They didn't. They reacted to Triple H like he was a top tier major superstar there to play the lead role in filling the gap left by Cena.
Then Triple H delivered. Say what you will about how Hunter is portrayed on TV and the type of unnecessary destruction of mid-card wrestlers he has left in his wake, he came though last night with an overall tremendous serious of performances. The first two matches weren't designed to be show-stealers, but that main event was. And I believe it was just that. Torch columnist Bruce Mitchell wasn't as high on it as I was (and James Caldwell was), which we discussed in last night's VIP audio roundtable, but it seems as if most readers agree with me that it was a special match in a year that hasn't had as many MOTY contenders as we've grown used to.
It's hard not to think of Orton's baggage when considering his contributions to WWE, but it has to be said that he comes through time after time with great in-ring work. He's not the flashiest wrestler, and he is maddeningly overreliant on headlocks early in matches, but he is a pro's pro in matches, a true ring general who seems to be getting better during a stretch of time where a number of legends from the Monday Night War era are beginning to age out.
But it was Hunter's night last night. He was in a really tough position and the fans accepted him immediately, and he earned that acceptable by working triple duty and putting in a show-saving performance with Orton in the main event.
By the way, yesterday was the cover date of the first-ever edition of Pro Wrestling Torch Newsletter (Oct. 7, 1987). This month we'll be celebrating our 20 years covering wrestling with a number of acknowledgment of our history, some of which will be part of the Torch Newsletter, but others that I will share on the website. Thanks to everyone who has been part of this great journey covering pro wrestling for the last 20 years. It's taken me places I could have never imagined and been a fulfilling job in so many ways. I've been able to meet an amazingly wide ranging group of people who have been unlikely friends over the years. I appreciate everyone who has visited PWTorch.com regularly since the website launched in 1999 and, of course, those who have subscribers - including a few who date back to the 1980s when we first began. I'll have more to say as the month progresses.
Updated Thursday, Oct. 4 - 3:30 p.m.
There is never a great time to lose a top star for any reason, and you never wish an injury upon anyone, but that said - Raw's rating headlined by Cena vs. Mr. Kennedy this week was just a 3.2. You have go back ten years to find a lower rated Raw on the first Monday of October. It's possible Cena was the only talent holding things together, but it's also possible that Cena had his fans and detractors, and that with him as the long-term champion centerpiece of Raw, it had become monotonous for many viewers who were watching less frequently, if at all. This injury forces Vince McMahon to take a new direction with Raw, and if he plays what cards he has well, it could lead to a surge in interest by presenting a product that feels fresher and newer. Just giving Orton and Hunter more TV time is the answer, though, isn't the likely best solution. Finding some newer, underutilized talents to give TV time would be nice. It's difficult to understand how McMahon thinks fans should watch two hours plus of Raw when 70 percent of it is filled with wrestlers who are firmly established to be jobbers to a few top tier players. The needless squashing and demeaning of Jeff Hardy (to both Umaga and Big Show over the past year), Cade & Murdoch, London & Kendrick, and Carlito (Hunter) has made the rest of the segments feel like filler, not a chance to see stars on the rise.
Send feedback on this article to pwtorch@gmail.com and we'll regularly publish reader feedback in the "Torch Feedback" category on the Main Listing.
For more BREAKING NEWS on WWE, TNA...
VISIT OUR AFFILIATE -
PROWRESTLING.NET
For UFC & MMA NEWS & BLOGS:
VISIT OUR SISTER SITE - MMATORCH.COM
Upgrade to PWTorch VIP:
DETAILS & SIGN-UP INFO (rates now as low as $2.99/month)
| More Recent KELLER'S TAKE Articles |
 KELLER: March 8 - An evaluation of whether Impact is showing its ready to compete with Raw |
| KELLER'S TAKE: What's in a name? Survivor Series a goner, but does it matter? |
| KELLER'S WWE RAW REPORT 2/8: Bret Hart appears again after John Cena reveals to McMahon that Bret wants him one-on-one at WrestleMania |
| KELLER'S VIP BLOG: A ratings experiment for TNA to try with the Knockouts |
| KELLER: Vince Russo owes wrestlers another apology, plus one to the fans |
| KELLER: Russo wants to be a better friend, not explain his booking decisions |
| KELLER: TNA Genesis Preview - A look at the line-up, potential surprises, major change made |
| KELLER: I've been edited! Here's what Russo said, and here's what I wrote that was deleted from his fan page |
| KELLER: Russo's right, he's pushing young wrestlers in top positions, but there's a big catch that negates that mattering |
| KELLER BLOG: Our TNA polls this week should frighten TNA headed into Jan. 4 |
| KELLER FLASHBACK: "Infidelity" turned into fake-shoot angle with Dallas Page-Buff Bagwell |
| KELLER'S BLOG: Ooops... I forgot perhaps the biggest problem with last week's "Worst Impact Ever" |
| KELLER BLOG: One of the biggest surprises TNA could deliver on Jan. 4 isn't a pro wrestler (w/Addendum) |
| KELLER: In defense of the Sheamus push - why this gamble by WWE is a smart move for the short-run and long-run |
| KELLER: Dixie's last speech on Impact was off-target; will tonight's heavily-hyped segment with her miss the mark again? |
| KELLER'S TNA IMPACT REPORT 11/26: Full quotes from Hulk Hogan on joining TNA, Dixie press conference hype, one-night title tournament |
| KELLER'S TAKE: Tito Ortiz took UFC into pro wrestling territory with his third round performance and post-fight interview (redirect) |
| KELLER BLOG: WrestleMania goes up to $55, all other PPVs $45 - let the pirate feed frenzy begin |
| KELLER BLOG: Dixie Carter asks wrestlers to step it up, but what does that mean? Shouldn't their goal to be winning matches and nothing else? |
| KELLER FLASHBACK: Review of Hulk Hogan's first autobiography - Hogan's political maneuvers evident in who he protects and buries |
(c) 1999-2010 TDH Communications Inc. - All rights reserved. |
