PWTORCH.COM

Select List of Articles by Category Type

SEARCH PWTORCH



CONTACT US

 JUMP TO VIP SITE

VIP SIGN-UP INFO

JUMP TO MMATORCH

UGO AFFILIATE

A PROUD UGO AFFILIATE SINCE 1999


PWTorch is customized for your mobile phone such as your Blackberry. Just enter www.pwtorch.com on your phone's browser and choose the "Mobile" option. Samsung Omnia II users, download our free Widget. Apple iPhone users, download our free PWTorch App (search "pwtorch")



 

KELLER'S TAKE

KELLER: Latest amendments to WWE Wellness Policy render it potentially pointless (Feb. 28, 2008)

Mar 18, 2009 - 9:48:10 AM


By Wade Keller, PWTorch editor

This Week with Wade Keller
Headline: How big are the loopholes in WWE's policy?
Originally Published: February 28, 2008
PWTorch Newsletter #1013


WWE officials touted the company's Wellness Policy last year. They said it was evolving and being amended to make it stronger and to protect wrestlers. I wanted to see those amendments. I had the original policy, but I didn't know what those changes were. Recently, WWE put a link to the complete policy rather than the abridged "press release" version which contained just highlights that had been available on the main corporate webpage previously.

The policy has been amended four times since it was initially released. The first change, dated June 13, 2006, added a couple pharmaceutical drugs to the banned substance list.

The Second Amendment, dated Aug. 21, 2006, stated that talent that was suspended for either 30 or 60 days could be "required, in WWE's sole discretion, to work televised events and pay-per-views."

The Third Amendment, dated May 16, 2007, just over a month before the Benoit Family Tragedy put WWE's policy back on the media radar, added the following:

"In the event of an initial positive result for drugs prohibited by this Policy, the Talent shall be fined an amount equal to 30 days’ pay deducted from your downside guarantee on a weekly basis. The Company may, at its discretion, schedule the Talent to work selected televised events without pay, pay-per-views with pay, and non-televised live events with a $200 stipend per event during the 30 day suspension period."

In the case of a second offense, the same applied - adding a potential requirement to work house shows with a $200 stipend - plus noted that if an individual needed rehab, " the Talent shall not be assigned to work until the individual has successfully completed the drug rehabilitation program. However, regardless of the length of the program, the Talent’s fine shall be limited to 60 days’ pay."

The Fourth Amendment (the last to date) added marijuana to the list of substances that could be tested for, but excluded it from the standard suspensions, instead noting that talent would be fined $1,000 per failure, deducted from the talent's downside guarantee. There are no suspensions or potential termination tied to repeated failures. Previously marijuana was only tested for on a "reasonable cause" basis. Alcohol remains a "reasonable cause only" test.

Did you catch all of that? Basically, the drug policy boils down to this now: If you get caught taking banned substances three times, your contract will be terminated. Try not to let that happen. The first two times you fail, you may or may not be punished much; it's up to us.

There is almost nothing binding to the first two failures, and even the third failure requiring termination has one big loophole. Let's start with that.

If a talent fails three drug tests, their contract is terminated. Yeah. So? How long is it before that wrestler can be brought back? Two years? Six months? Two months? Two weeks? A day? Two hours? It doesn't say.

Just going by the wording of this policy, if a fictional wrestling organization adopted the same policy, and its owner felt drug testing was silly, steroids and supplements weren't that harmful, and nobody should be telling any adults what to do anyway, this policy would allow the owner - after terminating the contract of his top, massively muscular wrestler who was taking loads of steroids and failed the test three times - to rehire him after a two week vacation in Europe - with a raise!

How would anyone - media, fans, other wrestlers, stock holders, Congress - know whether that was happening? They wouldn't. There's nothing in the amendments to the policy or the policy itself stating that policy failures will be made public 100 percent of the time. WWE said they would do that last fall, but it's not in this policy, and for all we know WWE has or could in the future not reveal all suspensions. Without a public announcement of 100 percent of drug test failures, there's no way to be sure wrestlers aren't failing three times, having their contract terminated, and being rehired days or hours later with no one being the wiser.

Let's go back to the other amendments. WWE does not want drug test failures to get in the way of drawing money. They may argue it's to protect the fans from paying for one thing and receiving less. Either way, after a wrestler gets suspended the first or second time, they aren't really suspended at all. They can continue to work every single event they would have anyway - house shows, TV events, and PPV events. The Third Amendment granted them pay for working house shows. Just $200, which for all I know is to cover themselves legally should the wrestler get hurt while being forced to work for nothing during a suspension.

The Third Amendment also now allows suspended wrestlers to work a pay-per-view event with pay. So the punishment now for being suspended is working a few house shows for $200 instead of the usual range of roughly $500 to $5,000 per event, but otherwise no missed TV time to promote and develop their character, no missed PPVs which accounts in the cases of top acts for huge chunks of their annual aggregate pay, and no public (or even backstage among colleagues) knowledge of the suspension - per the written policy. That's soft. Very soft. Especially when taking into account how WWE pays it wrestlers.

WWE wrestlers aren't paid like NBA players. NBA players, as in other pro team sports, receive a guaranteed salary for the season, with some having incentives built in. When an athlete is suspended, it's for a certain number of games, and their salary is deducted based on 1/82nd of their pay in an 82 game season. There is no way for that athlete to make up that lost income. Because of salary caps, a team can't "overpay" a star athlete next year or with his next contract because that could damage the team's ability to sign players to keep them competitive, and thus hurt their attendance and TV ratings. A suspended player absolutely loses substantial salary, plus potentially endorsement deals and fan adulation.

In WWE's case, it's totally up to WWE management whether that wrestler ends up actually punished by the end of the year. WWE salaries aren't public. So if a wrestler was receiving on average over the course of a typical month $2,000 per house show for six house shows, and is paid instead $200 per house show for six house shows in a "suspension month," the following month - after the suspension - WWE could pay that wrestler $3,800 per house show for six house shows, making up for the lost income the previous month.

A promoter who wanted a paper policy for p.r. reasons, but didn't want to have to enforce any of the policy, especially among its coddled top stars, would like this policy. Especially since the policy now dictates that suspended wrestlers can be called upon to work a scheduled PPV match "with pay." Full pay. And they stay on TV. No chance of "losing their spot" to an emerging star or losing momentum in a feud. No chance of peer pressure discouraging drug use, either. If a suspended wrestler had to drop out of a lucrative, ratings-drawing storyline, his colleagues would be affected adversely as it could cost them money if business went down. That peer pressure could lead to self-policing before drug tests caught the wrestler. That incentive is gone under this set-up.

Their deduction in pay is even less than the above scenario in most cases. Most wrestlers earn more than their downside guarantee. The fines are only 30 days worth of their downside guarantee. So a wrestler with a $365,000 downside guarantee who was actually earning triple that in a good year would be fined not 30 days' pay, but the equivalent of 10 days' pay - which could be easily made up with the promoter arbitrarily paying a little more than he would have otherwise for the next handful of house shows or PPVs. WWE's pay is informal, based on a loose formula with substantial discretion by the promoter. If the promoter is upset with the wrestler for failing a test, the punishment can be more severe - 30 days downside lost, plus being pulled from a PPV and TV events (and future PPVs, actually), but forced to work house shows for a $200 stipend, with no make-good informal increases in pay later. But if the promoter liked the wrestler and felt the drug they tested positive for wasn't a big deal, but was on the policy for p.r. reasons, that wrestler could be put in a position to lose absolutely nothing.

On a third failure, the wrestler's contact can be terminated, but he could be rehired an hour later with a new contract. With a raise, even!

In other words, the policy means nothing. Absolutely nothing, at least as written. It's up to the promoter to enforce it honestly. But what's the need for a policy then, other than p.r.? All this policy does it give a promoter the right to terminate a contract of a wrestler after three failures and cut his pay in the mean time, or not. That's it. The rest is fluff if the promoter so chooses. It sounds good, but based on how WWE pays its talent, it means nothing. Adding PPVs with pay into the mix is a telling move.

It's the sports equivalent of an NFL star being suspended for two games, but being allowed to play those games, but without pay, except they can be "bonused" the pay they lost at the end of the season. If they fail three times, they contract is terminated, but the team reserves the right to rehire them the next day, perhaps with a raise, even!

Is anyone in the mainstream media or Congress, whom this policy is meant to impress, going to notice these loopholes? Probably not. If you know nothing about how WWE pays its talent, or how a loss of 30 or 60 days of TV time is more threatening to a lot of millionaire talents with egos and an addiction to fame than a deduction in pay, then this policy looks pretty strict, comparable to other sports. It could be, but it doesn't have to be. The leeway is incredible.

There's a simple answer to this. WWE could add a Fifth Amendment putting in writing that suspensions will be made public each and every time there is a failure. And add that talents who fail three times will have their contracts terminated AND not be rehired for a period of at least X amount of time, say, two years. That amounts to a two year suspension, and that may or may not be seen as enough, but at least it'd be something that could be compared to pro sports.

As far as wrestlers working while suspended, that should be changed. The fans know that an advertised star may miss an event. NHL fans know when they buy season tickets, a star player may be suspended that they wanted to see. That's part of the deal and everyone accepts it. The risk of disappointing fans is part of the teeth of any policy that deters an athlete from breaking the policy and deters the team from conducting business in a way that encourages the use of banned drugs.

The other way to fix these loopholes is to disclose all suspensions and all salaries to an independent third party, assigned by Congress, which would make sure the policy was enforced evenly across the board and that there weren't oddities in how talents were paid after suspensions compared to before. Without that, the policy is, for all intents and purposes, pointless. Any wrestler knows if he's in good standing with the promoter, he risks nothing. No lost TV time. No loss in aggregate pay. No public humiliation. Nothing.

WWE's drug testing policy is an honor system. The independent drug testing agency has nothing to do with how suspensions and fines are executed, so their "independence" is irrelevant beyond randomly testing people and reporting failures. It's all up to Vince McMahon how anyone is actually punished.

Lower card wrestlers may be suspended when they fail to be made an example of. Main event wrestlers, if they read this policy closely, can rest comfortably that if McMahon chooses to, he can protect them without technically violating the written policy in any substantive way.


Send feedback on this article to pwtorch@gmail.com and we'll regularly publish reader feedback in the "Torch Feedback" category on the Main Listing.

For more BREAKING NEWS on WWE, TNA...
VISIT OUR AFFILIATE - PROWRESTLING.NET

For UFC & MMA NEWS & BLOGS:
VISIT OUR SISTER SITE - MMATORCH.COM

Upgrade to PWTorch VIP:

 DETAILS & SIGN-UP INFO (VIP Newsletter, Audio, Archives, No Ads on Website, VIP Email Reports, VIP Forum, more.)

More Recent KELLER'S TAKE Articles
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

(c) 1999-2010 TDH Communications Inc. - All rights reserved.

STAFF PICKS - TOP TEN RECENT ARTICLES
CALDWELL'S WWE RAW RESULTS 12/22: Ongoing "virtual-time" coverage of live Raw - Hulk Hogan guest-hosts, Piper's Pit, Street Fight re-re-re-match, more
LIVECAST AUDIO: Jim Ross talks live w/Wade Keller on Friday's PWTorch Livecast (now available on-demand)
VIP - PWTorch Newsletter #1385 (PDF & TEXT): WWE TLC Keller Report & Staff Roundtable, Mitchell on TLC, Parks on future WWE doc, Keller compares Ziggler & Sami Zayn’s characters, more
THIS WEEK'S TV RESULTS: Raw post-PPV, Super Smackdown, Main Event, NXT post-Takeover, ROH, more
C.M. PUNK MEDIA TOUR: Punk talks leaving WWE, heading to UFC, whether he will return, more



PWTORCH FREE AUDIO SHOWS
PWTORCH LIVECAST: Bruce & Travis take your calls tonight at 7:00 EST on PWTorchLivecast.com
LIVECAST AUDIO: Jim Ross talks live w/Wade Keller on Friday's PWTorch Livecast (now available on-demand)
LIVECAST AUDIO: Thursday PWTorch Livecast (12/18) now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (12/17) now available - Pat McNeill w/Bill Behrens
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (12/16) now available - Wade Keller & Jason Powell of Prowrestling.net
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (12/15) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant

PWTORCH INSTANT POLL
MCNEILL LIVECAST POLL: What's your favorite part of "WWE Week?"
 
pollcode.com free polls
RAW POLL 12/15: Monday's Raw was...
 
pollcode.com free polls


RAW POLL 12/15: What was your initial impression of Lesnar vs. Cena build for the Royal Rumble?
 
pollcode.com free polls
WWE PPV POLL: Rate TLC 0-10 if you saw the PPV
 
pollcode.com free polls


WWE PPV POLL: What was the Best Match at TLC?
 
pollcode.com free polls
VOTE IN OR SEE RESULTS OF PREVIOUS POLLS

UPCOMING MAJOR EVENTS

SELECT LIST OF ARTICLES BY CATEGORY

ARTICLES GROUPED BY CATEGORY
NEWS REPORTS
WWE NEWS: Raw TV update - Street Fight & Piper's Pit added
NEWSWIRE: USA claims ratings win, Staples Center main event, NXT Title match insight, Rampage's wrestling mindset
SHOW RESULTS - 12/20 JCW in Detroit, Mich.: "Rosebud" Jimmy Jacobs vs. 2 Tuff Tony for JCW Title, Necro, new tag champs, more
SHOW RESULTS - 12/19 FSW in Las Vegas: Hardy defends FSW Title vs. Lance Hoyt, more title matches, retirement
WWNLIVE NEWS: Hero announced for WM Weekend shows
WWNLIVE NEWS: Update on the future of Dragon Gate USA, several new matches for EVOLVE Florida tour
WWE NEWS: Smackdown SPOILERS - live TV taping report including notes on crowd reactions, Hogan, top stars, more
TNA NEWS: New tape library show to premiere in January; updated schedule for TNA's first month on Dest. America
NEWSWIRE: Result of Muta vs. TNA star, AAW launching second promotion, Pearce says farewell - where next?, Video - inside look at PWG including Four Horsewomen cameo
WWE NEWS: Smackdown SPOILERS 12/26, plus Main Event matches & other notes from Sunday's TV taping
WWE NETWORK: Monday, December 22 Schedule
WWE NEWS: Prelim Survivor Series PPV buys released
PPV REPORTS
CALDWELL'S WWE TLC PPV REPORT 12/14: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of Cena vs. Rollins, Roman Reigns involved, Ambrose vs. Wyatt, set-up for the Royal Rumble, more
CALDWELL'S WWE TLC PPV REPORT 12/14 (Pre-Show): Royal Rumble main event announced, New Day vs. Rhodes Bros., more
MCNEILL'S PPV BLOG 12/14: Live Blog for WWE TLC(&S) - ongoing thoughts & observations
RADICAN'S ROH "Final Battle 2014" PPV REPORT - ACH & Young Bucks vs. Addiction & Alexander, Briscoe-Cole blow off
CALDWELL'S ROH FINAL BATTLE 2014 PPV RESULTS 12/7: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of live PPV from New York City
MCNEILL'S PPV BLOG 11/23: Live Blog for Survivor Series - ongoing thoughts & observations
CALDWELL'S WWE S. SERIES PPV RESULTS 11/23: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of Team Cena vs. Team Authority, more
CALDWELL'S WWE S. SERIES PPV RESULTS 11/23 (Pre-Show): Heyman, Bad News, Fandango's in-ring return, more
RADICAN'S NJPW Power Struggle Report 11/8 - "Wrestle Kingdom" lineup takes shape, ReDragon-Time Splitters, Ishii-Goto MOTYC
KYGHT'S PPV EVALUATION - WWE Hell in a Cell: Best/Worst Match, Best Move/Finish, more!; Updates 2014 PPV Ranks
HIAC PPV VOTING: Poll Results for Overall Rating, Best Match, was the Bray Wyatt ending too screwy?
MCNEILL'S PPV BLOG 10/26: Live Blog for Hell in a Cell - ongoing thoughts & observations
TV REPORTS
CALDWELL'S WWE RAW RESULTS 12/22: Ongoing "virtual-time" coverage of live Raw - Hulk Hogan guest-hosts, Piper's Pit, Street Fight re-re-re-match, more
PARKS'S WWE SMACKDOWN REPORT 12/16: Complete coverage of Super Smackdown, including Rollins vs. Ziggler main event
JAMES'S WWE SUPERSTARS RESULTS 12/18: Kidd & Cesaro face Los Matadores, Summer vs. Emma
JAMES'S WWE NXT REPORT 12/18 - WEEK 131: Takeover fall-out, including Neville vs. Owens, Zayn's tiitle win, more; Overall Reax
DEHNEL'S LUCHA UNDERGROUND REPORT 12/17: Battle Royal & 10-way match set up main event (w/Analysis of Booking 101)
CALDWELL'S WWE TRIBUTE TO THE TROOPS REPORT 12/17: Wyatt vs. Ambrose Boot Camp TLC re-match, Team Cena vs. Team Authority, Hulk Hogan, D-Bryan, celeb videos, more
DEHNEL'S WWE MAIN EVENT REPORT 12/16: Rowan loses again, this time to Kane, plus Miz TV with Naomi, hi-jinks, more
CALDWELL'S WWE RAW RESULTS 12/15: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of live Raw - TLC fall-out, Jericho GM for the Night, Lesnar returns, Steel Cage main event, more
METZGER'S ROH TV REPORT 12/14: Post-Final Battle episode features 2014 Tag Wars - Briscoes, Bucks, Daniels & Kaz, more
PARKS'S WWE SMACKDOWN REPORT 12/12: Complete coverage of Friday night show, including Erick Rowan & Dolph Ziggler & Ryback vs. Luke Harper & Kane & The Big Show
NXT TAKEOVER ROUNDTABLE REVIEWS 12/11: Caldwell, Parks, Radican, James, Chiverton, "Instant Reaction" Ben Tucker rate and review WWE Network special
JAMES'S WWE NXT TAKEOVER "R-EVOLUTION" REPORT 12/11: Zayn completes two-year quest, Owens debuts, more; Overall Reax
OPINION & ANALYSIS
CALDWELL: The Top 5 Best Things In Wrestling This Week
ASK THE SPECIALISTS ROUNDTABLE: What One Rule Should be Brought Back/Fixed on WWE TV?
PARKS'S TAKE: Why is WWE loading up the pre-Royal Rumble episode of Raw?, plus Thoughts on New Japan U.S. announce team, Del Rio's first ROH matches, TNA re-branding, more!
MCNEILL LIVECAST POLL: What's the best part of WWE Week?
RAW POLLS 12/15: Vote on Monday's Raw & Lesnar-Cena hype
CALDWELL: What is WWE emphasizing coming out of TLC?, the answers capture the downfall of WWE's booking approach
WWE PPV REAX #1: Ziggler shines in hometown, but mixed reaction to Reigns's return, overall PPV, more
MCNEILL'S PPV BLOG 12/14: Live Blog for WWE TLC(&S) - ongoing thoughts & observations
TLC PPV POLLS: Vote on the PPV, plus Select Best match
Take The Stairs: McNEILL Previews WWE TLC 2014! (with a Wrestling History Lesson)
RADICAN'S A1 "King of Hearts 2013" DVD Report (8-17-13) - Alexander shines in tournamenet, rise of Johnny Wave, Banks defends ZG in Four-Way Elimination match
RADICAN'S ROH "Final Battle 2014" PPV REPORT - ACH & Young Bucks vs. Addiction & Alexander, Briscoe-Cole blow off
THE SPECIALISTS
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: The Top 14 Wrestling Figures of 2014
VALLEY'S TAKE: The Story of 2014 - The Rich Enough Beat The Super Rich ... or It Just Doesn't Kliq Anymore
HITS & MISSES - 12/16 WWE Super Smackdown: Reigns's return, Ryback / Rusev / Rollins / Ziggler, Uso Drama, Ziggler vs. Rollins
HITS & MISSES - 12/15 WWE Raw: Jericho, Lesnar's Return, The New Day, Roman Reigns, TLC fall-out, more
TUCKER'S INSTANT REACTION - Raw is Jericho a/k/a What Has Happened To Raw?
TUCKER'S LIVE INSTANT REACTION: TLC was the product of WWE de-sensitizing their audience, requiring more dangerous bumps, plus what kind of TV did the McMahons buy for Christmas?
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Brock Lesnar vs. C.M. Punk - In-Depth Review of Their Values Heading in Opposite Direction
CHIVERTON'S NXT SCOUTING REPORT: Final Rankings before "Takeover," full preview of Neville vs. Zayn masterpiece
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Action Figure Spotlight - Tyson Kidd & Natalya, plus Real Value of WWE vs. ROH Autographs
TUCKER'S INSTANT REACTION - Slammys Raw: "If you want something bland yet reliable, today's WWE is for you"
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Topps Takeover - Inside The Top Wrestling Trading Cards of 2014
VALLEY'S TAKE: My Public Apology to C.M. Punk, plus Random Thoughts on Batista's "Bond," Del Rio, more
PWTORCH EXCLUSIVES
RAW RETRO - 5 yrs. ago: DX taken to Little People's Court, MLB player guest-hosts Raw, Bret Hart return build-up, more
EXCLUSIVE: Jim Ross details working agreement with Global Force Wrestling, how the deal with Jarrett was arranged, gameplan calling Tokyo Dome Show, what does he think of Striker as co-announcer?, what Tanahashi vs. Okada reminds him of, more
WCW STARRCADE FLASHBACK - 15 yrs. ago today: Goldberg vs. Hart at Starrcade '99, plus Sting vs. Luger
SMACKDOWN FLASHBACK: Report from previous USA Network special 2 yrs. ago - Punk & Heyman promo, A.J. & Ziggler feuding with Cena, Big E. debut, D-Bryan teaming with Kane
RADICAN'S A1 "King of Hearts 2013" DVD Report (8-17-13) - Alexander shines in tournamenet, rise of Johnny Wave, Banks defends ZG in Four-Way Elimination match
RADICAN'S ROH "Final Battle 2014" PPV REPORT - ACH & Young Bucks vs. Addiction & Alexander, Briscoe-Cole blow off
WWE TLC RETRO - 5 Yrs. Ago: Sheamus pushes Cena through table to win WWE Title, Taker vs. Batista, DX captures Tag Titles
SMACKDOWN RETRO - 15 yrs. ago: McMahon-Helmsley Era begins, Edge vs. Christian, Hardy vs. Hardy, Rock Main Event, more
NXT FLASHBACK - 1 Year Ago today: Sami Zayn vs. Adam Rose main event, Rusev writes off Hero, more
WWE RAW RETRO - 5 Years Ago: Mark Cuban goes through a table, Jericho vs. DX, Cena-Sheamus feud, more
RADICAN'S "Wake Up Time To Die w/Sex Fergusun" review - character driven interview features Gallows hilarious performance
TNA IMPACT RETRO: Dec. 3, 2004: Randy Savage appears on Impact, Jarrett defends NWA Title, Hall, DDP, more
REFERENCE
TITLES & CHAMPS: Ongoing list of 2014 Titleholders
WWE NEWS: Super Smackdown TV ratings are in - live special flops on USA Network
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in - post-TLC episode flops, viewership hits year-low levels
TV NEWS: Smackdown TV ratings are in for Friday's show, plus viewership for Rock's new TNT show
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in - Slammys flops, Raw down 13 percent since Survivor Series
WWE NEWS: Smackdown TV ratings are in - Friday's show down 17 percent from previous two episodes
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in - Monday's show tumbles, falls back to pre-Survivor Series levels
WWE NEWS: Smackdown TV ratings are in - Friday's show draws another big audience despite holiday weekend
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in - did Survivor Series buzz translate to a 3.0 rating?
WWE NEWS: Smackdown TV ratings are in - Friday's show pops big TV rating leading into Survivor Series
TNA NEWS: Impact TV ratings are in for Wednesday's show
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in - how did the final show before Survivor Series fare?
PWTorch Free Podcast
PWTORCH LIVECAST: Bruce & Travis take your calls tonight at 7:00 EST on PWTorchLivecast.com
LIVECAST AUDIO: Jim Ross talks live w/Wade Keller on Friday's PWTorch Livecast (now available on-demand)
LIVECAST AUDIO: Thursday PWTorch Livecast (12/18) now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (12/17) now available - Pat McNeill w/Bill Behrens
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (12/16) now available - Wade Keller & Jason Powell of Prowrestling.net
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (12/15) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant
LIVECAST AUDIO: Special PWTorch Livecast (12/14) following TLC now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Friday PWTorch Livecast (12/12) now available - Wade Keller w/Piermarini & MMATorch's Penick
LIVECAST AUDIO: Thursday PWTorch Livecast (12/11) now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (12/10) now available - Pat McNeill & Jim Valley live w/Kevin Gill
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (12/9) now available - Wade Keller & Jason Powell of Prowrestling.net
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (12/8) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant
VIP Exclusive Features
VIP - 12/21 Pat McNeill & Jim Valley's "Wayback Playback" Audio Show (ep. #14): Into the WWF Time Machine for Main Event from February 1989! (59 min.)
VIP - 12/21 Wade Keller Hotline - The News: Ric Flair special referee at WWE house show, Reigns reception, Survivor Series PPV butyrate news and history, live Smackdown bombs, Rampage Jackson-UFC news, more (19 min.)
VIP - 12/21 Bruce Mitchell Audio Show w/Wade Keller, pt. 2: Randy Savage DVD discussion including Vince's HOF promise, history of Savage pre-WWF, Savage-Honky controversy, plus did Piper ever almost become WWE Champ? (64 min.)
VIP - 12/21 Audio Flashback - Bruce Mitchell Audio Show: Legacy of Kevin Nash and reflecting on his WWF Title win 10 years earlier, Tough Enough cross-dressing, Heyman removed from SD booking team, should Batista turn (52 min.)
VIP - 12/21 Audio Flashback - Wade Keller Hotline (12-02-2004): Tough Enough shoot fight, PPV schedule becomes ludicrous, Raw ratings analysis, Hunter’s hypocrisy, WWE announcers, guest G.M. thoughts, more (23 min.)
VIP - 12/21 Moonlighting with Greg Parks: With PWTorch contributor Tony Donofrio, discussing the latest episodes of WWE's special episode of Smackdown, Main Event, and NXT (67 min.)
VIP - 12/20 Wade Keller Hotline - Ask the Editor: Running down a few Rumble-to-WrestleMania scenarios with Reigns, Orton, Lesnar, Bryan, plus how about an alternative audio track on WWE PPVs with Ross & Heyman? (19 min.)
VIP - 12/20 Bruce Mitchell Audio Show w/Wade Keller, pt. 1: History of Tuesday Night Titans WWF talk show with Vince McMahon, what was the story behind Herb Abrams’s UWF, Punk’s place in mainstream, Bill Watts-WWF history (64 min.)
VIP - 12/20 Audio Flashback - Guttman Audio Show (11-23-2004): World Title controversy on Raw, Orton’s terrible stint at GM, Maven’s turn, Eugene, Daivari’s ignorant ill-informed rant, Moment of Insanity, more (35 min.)
VIP - 12/20 Audio Flashback - Real Deal w/Pat McNeill (11-27-2004): Vince takes the money and runs, can Dusty Book in modern environment, ROH under siege, Raw ratings surge, Indy Line-up of Week with Luger vs. Bagwell (18 min.)
VIP - PWTorch Newsletter Back Issue #313 PDF & TEXT (20 Yrs. Ago): Gracie beats Severn at UFC IV, exclusive interview with Severn on loss, ECW Arena Holiday Hell, Cactus Jack Torch Talk on his future (12-24-94)
VIP - 12/19 Wade Keller Hotline - Ask the Editor: What are the odds of Vince McMahon ever doing an autobiography? Does Vince have a favorite match? Devon Dudley join A New Day? Did Punk gripes fade away already? (27 min.)