PWTORCH.COM

Select List of Articles by Category Type

SEARCH PWTORCH



CONTACT US

 JUMP TO VIP SITE

VIP SIGN-UP INFO

JUMP TO MMATORCH

UGO AFFILIATE

A PROUD UGO AFFILIATE SINCE 1999


PWTorch is customized for your mobile phone such as your Blackberry. Just enter www.pwtorch.com on your phone's browser and choose the "Mobile" option. Samsung Omnia II users, download our free Widget. Apple iPhone users, download our free PWTorch App (search "pwtorch")



 

KELLER'S TAKE

KELLER: Latest amendments to WWE Wellness Policy render it potentially pointless (Feb. 28, 2008)

Mar 18, 2009 - 9:48:10 AM


By Wade Keller, PWTorch editor

This Week with Wade Keller
Headline: How big are the loopholes in WWE's policy?
Originally Published: February 28, 2008
PWTorch Newsletter #1013


WWE officials touted the company's Wellness Policy last year. They said it was evolving and being amended to make it stronger and to protect wrestlers. I wanted to see those amendments. I had the original policy, but I didn't know what those changes were. Recently, WWE put a link to the complete policy rather than the abridged "press release" version which contained just highlights that had been available on the main corporate webpage previously.

The policy has been amended four times since it was initially released. The first change, dated June 13, 2006, added a couple pharmaceutical drugs to the banned substance list.

The Second Amendment, dated Aug. 21, 2006, stated that talent that was suspended for either 30 or 60 days could be "required, in WWE's sole discretion, to work televised events and pay-per-views."

The Third Amendment, dated May 16, 2007, just over a month before the Benoit Family Tragedy put WWE's policy back on the media radar, added the following:

"In the event of an initial positive result for drugs prohibited by this Policy, the Talent shall be fined an amount equal to 30 days’ pay deducted from your downside guarantee on a weekly basis. The Company may, at its discretion, schedule the Talent to work selected televised events without pay, pay-per-views with pay, and non-televised live events with a $200 stipend per event during the 30 day suspension period."

In the case of a second offense, the same applied - adding a potential requirement to work house shows with a $200 stipend - plus noted that if an individual needed rehab, " the Talent shall not be assigned to work until the individual has successfully completed the drug rehabilitation program. However, regardless of the length of the program, the Talent’s fine shall be limited to 60 days’ pay."

The Fourth Amendment (the last to date) added marijuana to the list of substances that could be tested for, but excluded it from the standard suspensions, instead noting that talent would be fined $1,000 per failure, deducted from the talent's downside guarantee. There are no suspensions or potential termination tied to repeated failures. Previously marijuana was only tested for on a "reasonable cause" basis. Alcohol remains a "reasonable cause only" test.

Did you catch all of that? Basically, the drug policy boils down to this now: If you get caught taking banned substances three times, your contract will be terminated. Try not to let that happen. The first two times you fail, you may or may not be punished much; it's up to us.

There is almost nothing binding to the first two failures, and even the third failure requiring termination has one big loophole. Let's start with that.

If a talent fails three drug tests, their contract is terminated. Yeah. So? How long is it before that wrestler can be brought back? Two years? Six months? Two months? Two weeks? A day? Two hours? It doesn't say.

Just going by the wording of this policy, if a fictional wrestling organization adopted the same policy, and its owner felt drug testing was silly, steroids and supplements weren't that harmful, and nobody should be telling any adults what to do anyway, this policy would allow the owner - after terminating the contract of his top, massively muscular wrestler who was taking loads of steroids and failed the test three times - to rehire him after a two week vacation in Europe - with a raise!

How would anyone - media, fans, other wrestlers, stock holders, Congress - know whether that was happening? They wouldn't. There's nothing in the amendments to the policy or the policy itself stating that policy failures will be made public 100 percent of the time. WWE said they would do that last fall, but it's not in this policy, and for all we know WWE has or could in the future not reveal all suspensions. Without a public announcement of 100 percent of drug test failures, there's no way to be sure wrestlers aren't failing three times, having their contract terminated, and being rehired days or hours later with no one being the wiser.

Let's go back to the other amendments. WWE does not want drug test failures to get in the way of drawing money. They may argue it's to protect the fans from paying for one thing and receiving less. Either way, after a wrestler gets suspended the first or second time, they aren't really suspended at all. They can continue to work every single event they would have anyway - house shows, TV events, and PPV events. The Third Amendment granted them pay for working house shows. Just $200, which for all I know is to cover themselves legally should the wrestler get hurt while being forced to work for nothing during a suspension.

The Third Amendment also now allows suspended wrestlers to work a pay-per-view event with pay. So the punishment now for being suspended is working a few house shows for $200 instead of the usual range of roughly $500 to $5,000 per event, but otherwise no missed TV time to promote and develop their character, no missed PPVs which accounts in the cases of top acts for huge chunks of their annual aggregate pay, and no public (or even backstage among colleagues) knowledge of the suspension - per the written policy. That's soft. Very soft. Especially when taking into account how WWE pays it wrestlers.

WWE wrestlers aren't paid like NBA players. NBA players, as in other pro team sports, receive a guaranteed salary for the season, with some having incentives built in. When an athlete is suspended, it's for a certain number of games, and their salary is deducted based on 1/82nd of their pay in an 82 game season. There is no way for that athlete to make up that lost income. Because of salary caps, a team can't "overpay" a star athlete next year or with his next contract because that could damage the team's ability to sign players to keep them competitive, and thus hurt their attendance and TV ratings. A suspended player absolutely loses substantial salary, plus potentially endorsement deals and fan adulation.

In WWE's case, it's totally up to WWE management whether that wrestler ends up actually punished by the end of the year. WWE salaries aren't public. So if a wrestler was receiving on average over the course of a typical month $2,000 per house show for six house shows, and is paid instead $200 per house show for six house shows in a "suspension month," the following month - after the suspension - WWE could pay that wrestler $3,800 per house show for six house shows, making up for the lost income the previous month.

A promoter who wanted a paper policy for p.r. reasons, but didn't want to have to enforce any of the policy, especially among its coddled top stars, would like this policy. Especially since the policy now dictates that suspended wrestlers can be called upon to work a scheduled PPV match "with pay." Full pay. And they stay on TV. No chance of "losing their spot" to an emerging star or losing momentum in a feud. No chance of peer pressure discouraging drug use, either. If a suspended wrestler had to drop out of a lucrative, ratings-drawing storyline, his colleagues would be affected adversely as it could cost them money if business went down. That peer pressure could lead to self-policing before drug tests caught the wrestler. That incentive is gone under this set-up.

Their deduction in pay is even less than the above scenario in most cases. Most wrestlers earn more than their downside guarantee. The fines are only 30 days worth of their downside guarantee. So a wrestler with a $365,000 downside guarantee who was actually earning triple that in a good year would be fined not 30 days' pay, but the equivalent of 10 days' pay - which could be easily made up with the promoter arbitrarily paying a little more than he would have otherwise for the next handful of house shows or PPVs. WWE's pay is informal, based on a loose formula with substantial discretion by the promoter. If the promoter is upset with the wrestler for failing a test, the punishment can be more severe - 30 days downside lost, plus being pulled from a PPV and TV events (and future PPVs, actually), but forced to work house shows for a $200 stipend, with no make-good informal increases in pay later. But if the promoter liked the wrestler and felt the drug they tested positive for wasn't a big deal, but was on the policy for p.r. reasons, that wrestler could be put in a position to lose absolutely nothing.

On a third failure, the wrestler's contact can be terminated, but he could be rehired an hour later with a new contract. With a raise, even!

In other words, the policy means nothing. Absolutely nothing, at least as written. It's up to the promoter to enforce it honestly. But what's the need for a policy then, other than p.r.? All this policy does it give a promoter the right to terminate a contract of a wrestler after three failures and cut his pay in the mean time, or not. That's it. The rest is fluff if the promoter so chooses. It sounds good, but based on how WWE pays its talent, it means nothing. Adding PPVs with pay into the mix is a telling move.

It's the sports equivalent of an NFL star being suspended for two games, but being allowed to play those games, but without pay, except they can be "bonused" the pay they lost at the end of the season. If they fail three times, they contract is terminated, but the team reserves the right to rehire them the next day, perhaps with a raise, even!

Is anyone in the mainstream media or Congress, whom this policy is meant to impress, going to notice these loopholes? Probably not. If you know nothing about how WWE pays its talent, or how a loss of 30 or 60 days of TV time is more threatening to a lot of millionaire talents with egos and an addiction to fame than a deduction in pay, then this policy looks pretty strict, comparable to other sports. It could be, but it doesn't have to be. The leeway is incredible.

There's a simple answer to this. WWE could add a Fifth Amendment putting in writing that suspensions will be made public each and every time there is a failure. And add that talents who fail three times will have their contracts terminated AND not be rehired for a period of at least X amount of time, say, two years. That amounts to a two year suspension, and that may or may not be seen as enough, but at least it'd be something that could be compared to pro sports.

As far as wrestlers working while suspended, that should be changed. The fans know that an advertised star may miss an event. NHL fans know when they buy season tickets, a star player may be suspended that they wanted to see. That's part of the deal and everyone accepts it. The risk of disappointing fans is part of the teeth of any policy that deters an athlete from breaking the policy and deters the team from conducting business in a way that encourages the use of banned drugs.

The other way to fix these loopholes is to disclose all suspensions and all salaries to an independent third party, assigned by Congress, which would make sure the policy was enforced evenly across the board and that there weren't oddities in how talents were paid after suspensions compared to before. Without that, the policy is, for all intents and purposes, pointless. Any wrestler knows if he's in good standing with the promoter, he risks nothing. No lost TV time. No loss in aggregate pay. No public humiliation. Nothing.

WWE's drug testing policy is an honor system. The independent drug testing agency has nothing to do with how suspensions and fines are executed, so their "independence" is irrelevant beyond randomly testing people and reporting failures. It's all up to Vince McMahon how anyone is actually punished.

Lower card wrestlers may be suspended when they fail to be made an example of. Main event wrestlers, if they read this policy closely, can rest comfortably that if McMahon chooses to, he can protect them without technically violating the written policy in any substantive way.


Send feedback on this article to pwtorch@gmail.com and we'll regularly publish reader feedback in the "Torch Feedback" category on the Main Listing.

For more BREAKING NEWS on WWE, TNA...
VISIT OUR AFFILIATE - PROWRESTLING.NET

For UFC & MMA NEWS & BLOGS:
VISIT OUR SISTER SITE - MMATORCH.COM

Upgrade to PWTorch VIP:

 DETAILS & SIGN-UP INFO (VIP Newsletter, Audio, Archives, No Ads on Website, VIP Email Reports, VIP Forum, more.)

More Recent KELLER'S TAKE Articles
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

(c) 1999-2010 TDH Communications Inc. - All rights reserved.

STAFF PICKS - TOP TEN RECENT ARTICLES
PARKS'S WWE SMACKDOWN REPORT 10/31: Ongoing "virtual time" coverage of the Halloween episode, including Divas Costume Battle Royal, Dean Ambrose vs. Cesaro in Trick-or-Street Fight
WWE FINANCIALS COVERAGE: WWE reports Third Quarter 2014 Business, releases Network subscriber count, introduces new pricing plan, more details
CALDWELL'S WWE SMACKDOWN TV TAPING REPORT: In-person coverage of "Halloween" Smackdown TV taping (with no Vince McMahon message that aired on Smackdown)
VIP - PWTorch Newsletter #1378 (PDF & TEXT): Keller's Hell in a Cell PPV Report and Torch Staff PPV Roundtable Reviews, Pg. 2 Radar on Billy Jack Haynes suing WWE, Mitchell on WWE's varied clientele, Parks on the Class of 2002
LATEST ASK THE TORCH FEATURES: Catch up on Ask the Staff, All-Star Panel, and Specialists Roundtables



PWTORCH FREE AUDIO SHOWS
LIVECAST AUDIO: Friday PWTorch Livecast (10/31) now available - Keller talks live w/John Piermarini
LIVECAST AUDIO: Thursday PWTorch Livecast (10/30) now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (10/29) now available - Pat McNeill & the All-Star Panel
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (10/28) now available - Wade Keller & Jason Powell of Prowrestling.net
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (10/27) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant
LIVECAST AUDIO: Special PWTorch Livecast following HIAC PPV now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks

PWTORCH INSTANT POLL
SMACKDOWN POLL 10/31: What was your favorite thing from the Halloween show?
 
pollcode.com free polls


SD POLL 10/31: How much does it bother you that WWE told crowd their "Yes!" chants were for Bryan, but edited them into response to VKM Network pitch?
 
pollcode.com free polls
LUCHA UNDERGROUND POLL: If you watched the series premiere, what did you think?
 
pollcode.com free polls
MCNEILL LIVECAST POLL: Al Castle from PWI is on the Livecast today to talk about the PWI 500. Is your opinion, who should be ranked #1?
 
pollcode.com free polls
VOTE IN OR SEE RESULTS OF PREVIOUS POLLS

UPCOMING MAJOR EVENTS

SELECT LIST OF ARTICLES BY CATEGORY

ARTICLES GROUPED BY CATEGORY
NEWS REPORTS
WWE NEWS: WWE uses "get well" message for Daniel Bryan to promote Network announcement instead; super-imposes McMahon on Smackdown broadcast
WWE NEWS: Sports Legacy Institute confirms Triple H on Board of Directors; Chris Nowinski comments
WWE NEWS: WWE addresses legal action against the company in SEC filing - what did WWE say about the TV contract lawsuits & Billy Jack Haynes's suit?
NEWSWIRE: Sonnen claims $5 million WWE offer, WWE star at World Series parade, release date for WWE Christmas movie, Cena grants wish, Del Rio & TNA stars in Japan, Elgin, more
WWE NEWS: Non-Spoiler matches for Halloween Smackdown
CALDWELL'S WWE SMACKDOWN TV TAPING REPORT: In-person coverage of "Halloween" Smackdown TV taping (with no Vince McMahon message that aired on Smackdown)
WWE NEWS: WWE reveals U.K. launch date for WWE Network
TNA NEWS: Impact quarter-hour TV ratings - details on Wednesday's episode fared with a TNA Title main event
TNA NEWS: Impact TV ratings are in - how did TNA fare against World Series Game 7?
WWE NEWS: How did the stock market respond to WWE's latest quarterly earnings report?
ROCK NEWS: Fortune runs big profile on The Rock - WWE return?, steroid use?, future in movies & TV, more
WWE Q3 CONFERENCE CALL: McMahon & Barrios host discussion of Network performance & future, Rogers Canada deal, more
PPV REPORTS
HIAC PPV VOTING: Poll Results for Overall Rating, Best Match, was the Bray Wyatt ending too screwy?
MCNEILL'S PPV BLOG 10/26: Live Blog for Hell in a Cell - ongoing thoughts & observations
CALDWELL'S WWE HIAC PPV REPORT 10/26: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of live PPV - double Hell in a Cell main event of Ambrose vs. Rollins and Cena vs. Orton
CALDWELL'S WWE HIAC PPV REPORT 10/26 (Pre-Show): Miz TV, Paul Heyman on the panel, more
KYGHT'S PPV EVALUATION - TNA Bound for Glory: Best/Worst Match, What Will Be Remembered?, Updated 2014 Rankings
PPV RESULTS - 10/13 New Japan in Tokyo, Japan: Styles drops IWGP World Hvt. Title to Tanahashi, more title changes, former WWE star returns to New Japan, more
KYGHT'S PPV EVALUATION - Night of Champions: Best/Worst Match, Surprise/Letdown, Updated 2014 PPV Rankings, and a message to WWE on making PPV buyers feel like morons
ROH "ALL-STAR EXTRAVAGANZA" ROUNDTABLE: Radican, Metzger, Leahy rate & review ROH's most-recent show
MCNEILL'S PPV BLOG 9/21: Live Blog for Night of Champions - ongoing thoughts & observations
CALDWELL'S WWE NOC PPV REPORT 9/21: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of live PPV - Lesnar vs. Cena
CALDWELL'S WWE NOC PPV REPORT 9/21 (Pre-Show): Christian's Peep Show with Jericho, Roman Reigns injury update
CALDWELL'S NEW JAPAN PPV RESULTS 9/21: Complete live coverage of "Destruction in Kobe" - Nakamura regains IC Title, Tanahashi vs. Shibata, A.J. Styles, new Jr. Hvt. champion, more
TV REPORTS
PARKS'S WWE SMACKDOWN REPORT 10/31: Ongoing "virtual time" coverage of the Halloween episode, including Divas Costume Battle Royal, Dean Ambrose vs. Cesaro in Trick-or-Street Fight
JAMES'S WWE SUPERSTARS REPORT 10/30: Kidd vs. Cara main event, Summer faces Emma in Divas action
JAMES'S WWE NXT REPORT 10/30 - Week 124: Zayn vs. O'Neil main event, battle royal, more; Overall Reax
TNA IMPACT RESULTS 10/29: Lashley vs. Roode for the TNA Title, tournament continues, KO heel turn, more
10/29 LUCHA UNDERGROUND TV REPORT (EPISODE #1): Prince Puma vs. Johnny Mundo (Morrison), Konnan, Ezekiel Jackson, Vampiro, Matt Striker
DEHNEL'S WWE MAIN EVENT REPORT 10/28: Miz TV double trouble, Bo Dallas faces U.S. champ, Paige vs. Natalya
CALDWELL'S WWE RAW RESULTS 10/27: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of Hell in a Cell fall-out, Cena vs. Rollins, Ambrose responds to Bray Wyatt, two title matches, Hulk Hogan, more
METZGER'S ROH TV REPORT 10/26: All ROH Titles on the line on "Championship Week," including Briscoe vs. Bennett
PARKS'S WWE SMACKDOWN REPORT 10/24: Ongoing "virtual time" coverage of Friday show, including Dolph Ziggler vs. Cesaro for the Intercontinental Championship
JAMES'S WWE SUPERSTARS REPORT 10/23: Swagger vs. Bo Dallas main event, plus Kofi vs. Kidd
JAMES'S WWE NXT REPORT 10/23: Neville defends NXT Title against Titus O'Neil, Tyler Breeze, Ascension, more; Overall Reax
TNA IMPACT RESULTS 10/22: TNA Title match contract signing, Tag Tournament begins, hardcore match, more
OPINION & ANALYSIS
ASK PWTORCH STAFF for 10/31: Could a point system work in WWE? Should WWE create a Botchmania special hosted by Mike Adamle? How big of a problem is WWE announcers not selling heels cheating? WWE Magazine shutdown?
SD POLLS 10/31: Vote on your favorite thing from Halloween Smackdown & WWE using Bryan chants for Network pitch
VALLEY: The story behind the 1980s wrestler who is suing WWE for egregious mistreatment of its wrestlers over the years
GUEST REVIEWS: Lucha Underground - perspective from TV taping, editorial on strengths & weaknesses of first episode
ASK PWTORCH ALL-STARS 10/30: Is Cena too Super? Is Goldberg vs. Cena in the cards in the future? Why did the WWE Magazine cease publishing? When did a wrestler land on your radar as “one to watch?"
RADICAN: An independent solution to WWE's stagnant mid-card; Thoughts on WWE PPV finishes, Final Battle, WWNLive in China
LUCHA UNDERGROUND POLL: Vote on the series premiere
LIVECAST POLL: Who should be ranked #1 in the PWI 500?
PARKS'S TAKE: The Raw TV Main Event Plague, plus thoughts on Lucha premiere, tonight's Impact, Chamber PPV's proper slot, more!
QOTD REAX #3: More feedback on whether WWE gets a pass for non-finishes on Network Era PPVs
VOTE: What do you plan to watch tonight on television?
ASK THE SPECIALISTS ROUNDTABLE: Who will John Cena face at WrestleMania 31?
THE SPECIALISTS
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: PWTorch Exclusive Interview - Toy Designer Talks New ROH Action Figure Line
CHIVERTON'S NXT SCOUTING REPORT: Latest Rankings & Evaluation of the roster heading toward "Takeover" special
HITS & MISSES - 10/27 WWE Raw: Henry Turn, Cena - Authority, Ambrose - Wyatt, Cena vs. Rollins
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Where to Find Trading Cards of Lucha Underground’s Top Stars
TUCKER LIVE AT HIAC: Instant Reaction to Sunday's PPV
VALLEY'S TAKE: Wrestling Fans Are Frustrated, But Why?, Plus Random Thoughts on RKO Vines, Triple H, more
CHIVERTON'S NXT SCOUTING REPORT: Latest Evaluation of WWE prospects, plus play along with the Drake Younger hashtag
10/20 WWE Raw Hits & Misses: Miz & Mizdow, Orton - Cena - Heyman,, Mick Foley, Rusev - Big Show, Ambrose and a Mannequin
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Batista’s Star-Making Role Has Collectors Chasing His "Guardians" Cards
TUCKER'S RAW INSTANT REACTION: "This Hell in a Cell sure is dangerous ... now time for a joke"
VALLEY'S TAKE: Who are these guys? Fans aren't given enough information to be fully emotionally invested in today's WWE stars, plus Random Thoughts
CHIVERTON'S NXT SCOUTING REPORT: Latest NXT Rankings & Evaluation of WWE's top prospects
PWTORCH EXCLUSIVES
WWE RAW FIVE YEARS AGO: Triple H vs. Big Show main event, John Cena on his feud with Randy Orton: "The rivalry needed to end, and it did!"
WWE NEWS FIVE YEARS AGO - Shane McMahon shocks wrestling industry by resigning from WWE
WCW WEDNESDAY: Nitro episode airing today on WWE Network - Ric Flair vs. Hulk Hogan on live Nitro
10 YRS AGO: Ring of Honor event in Chicago features Punk vs. Samoa Joe one hour draw, plus Delirious, Sydal, Nigel, Jacobs, Shelley, Homicide
WWE RAW 5 YEARS AGO: WWE forces Raw vs. Smackdown feud leading to Bragging Rights, plus Snoop Dogg, Triple H vs. John Cena, Marty Jannetty, more
10 YRS AGO - WWE Live Event - 10/19/2004 in Minneapolis: Undertaker vs. JBL in main event among worst main events ever, Big Show vs. Angle, Carlito vs. Eddie, Taker vs. Heidenreich
RADICAN'S NJPW "G1 Climax 23: Day 1" report 8/1/13 - Suzuki-Nagata, Tanahashi-Kojima, Okada-Devitt main event
RADICAN'S "The Kevin Steen Show with Gabe Sapolsky" review - fatherhood, lessons learned after being fired from ROH, launching EVOLVE, Heyman, inside the Steen-Generico-Briscoes feud
RADICAN'S CHIKARA King of Trios 2014: Night 2 report 9/20 - Rey De Voladores mini-tournament begins, Spud, Sanda, Tatsu in action, Flood-Colony main event
20 YRS AGO: Report on WWE house show at Bourne High School headlined by Bulldog vs. Owen, Razor Ramon vs. Backlund, plus Adam Bomb, Volkoff, bundy, Doink, Gunns
10 YRS AGO: Reader Reax to Oct. 14, 2004 edition of Raw with Ric Flair, RVD, Austin, Steiner, RVD, Shawn Michaels, Goldberg, Bishoff
20 YRS AGO: Cactus vs. Sabu headlines NWA event - pioneering hardcore style match with moonsault onto table, plus Al Snow
REFERENCE
TNA NEWS: Impact quarter-hour TV ratings - details on Wednesday's episode fared with a TNA Title main event
TNA NEWS: Impact TV ratings are in - how did TNA fare against World Series Game 7?
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in - how did the post-Hell in a Cell episode fare versus the NFL?
WWE NEWS: Total Divas viewership for Sunday's mid-season finale; overall performance of Season 3
WWE NEWS: Smackdown TV ratings are in - Friday's show gets clobbered against World Series
TITLES & CHAMPS: Ongoing list of 2014 Titleholders
TNA NEWS: Impact TV ratings are in for Wednesday's show
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in for Monday's show - how did the HIAC lead-in episode fare?
WWE NEWS: Total Divas continues Sunday night slide
WWE NEWS: Smackdown TV ratings are in for Friday's show
TNA NEWS: Impact TV quarter-hour ratings - details on this week's show sliding to near-low on Wednesday nights
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in - Monday's show rebounds from year-low, but there is a concerning demo & viewership pattern
PWTorch Free Podcast
LIVECAST AUDIO: Friday PWTorch Livecast (10/31) now available - Keller talks live w/John Piermarini
LIVECAST AUDIO: Thursday PWTorch Livecast (10/30) now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (10/29) now available - Pat McNeill & the All-Star Panel
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (10/28) now available - Wade Keller & Jason Powell of Prowrestling.net
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (10/27) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant
LIVECAST AUDIO: Special PWTorch Livecast following HIAC PPV now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Friday PWTorch Livecast (10/24) now available - Wade Keller talks live w/Sean Waltman
LIVECAST AUDIO: Thursday PWTorch Livecast (10/23) now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (10/22) now available - McNeill w/wrestling author Paul O'Brien
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (10/21) now available - Wade Keller takes live calls
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (10/20) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant
LIVECAST AUDIO: Friday PWTorch Livecast (10/17) now available - RVD Interview w/Wade Keller
VIP Exclusive Features
VIP - 10/31 Moonlighting with Greg Parks: With PWTorch contributor Justin James, discussing the latest episodes of Smackdown, NXT and Superstars (48 min.)
VIP - 10/31 Wade Keller Hotline - Ask the Editor: Should WWE consider moving PPVs from Sundays to Tuesdays? Who are possible WrestleMania 31 opponents for Seth Rollins? Are heel commentators necessary in this era? Ross? Ventura? (29 min.)
VIP - 10/31 AD-FREE PWTorch Livecast & VIP Aftershow w/John Piermarini: Ex-Creative Team member takes listeners inside booking meetings with Vince McMahon, plus how are expenses covered for writers on the road, Bray angle (43 min.)
VIP - 10/31 Audio Flashback - Keller's WWE No Mercy Post-PPV Show (10-03-2004): Cena vs. Booker T in U.S. Title five match series, Undertaker vs. JBL for WWE Title, Show vs. Angle, plus Eddie, Rey, RVD, Kidman, Dudleys, Dawn Marie (37 min.)
VIP - 10/30 Bruce Mitchell Audio Show w/Wade Keller, pt. 1: So now what? WWE Network numbers are in and it's time for WWE to reevaluate some ways of doing business to fix what's wrong and build on what's right (62 min.)
VIP - 10/30 Wade Keller Hotline - WWE Network Update: Full analysis and perspective on today's third quarter data on WWE Network subscribers, what the numbers mean, where it goes from here (30 min.)
VIP - 10/30 PWTorch Livecast: James Caldwell & Greg Parks: In-depth discussion on WWE Network & business standing, fixing biz by fixing the "core product," is McMahon right person to lead in Network Era?, new TNA champ, Lucha premiere, more! (120 min.)
VIP - 10/29 East Coast Cast (ep. #214): Rollins up, Ambrose down, WWE continues to use heels to pitch products, Henry's heel turn, Network subs, more!; VIP Conversation (189 min.)
VIP - 10/29 PWTorch Livecast: Pat McNeill & All-Star panelists Al Castle of PWI & Scott Fishman of the Miami Herald: PWI 500 insight, this week in wrestling, more!; VIP - News & Events & live SD TV taping perspective (99 min.)
VIP - 10/29 Wade Keller Hotline - Ask the Editor: Did Cena need to equate WWE to being a "cause" on his promo on Raw? Why is it bad for WWE biz to have Triple H & Steph as on-air heels? Is it time for Network specials on territory days? (30 min)
VIP - PWTorch Newsletter #1378 (PDF & TEXT): Keller's Hell in a Cell PPV Report and Torch Staff PPV Roundtable Reviews, Pg. 2 Radar on Billy Jack Haynes suing WWE, Mitchell on WWE's varied clientele, Parks on the Class of 2002
VIP - 10/28 Wade Keller Hotline - The News: Ratings news, time to elevate second tier wrestlers into top tier stars, MSG line-up reveals Rusev's next feud, Post-Raw happenings, WWE's latest fan survey, Network predictions (14 min.)