PWTORCH.COM

Select List of Articles by Category Type

SEARCH PWTORCH



CONTACT US

 JUMP TO VIP SITE

VIP SIGN-UP INFO

JUMP TO MMATORCH

UGO AFFILIATE

A PROUD UGO AFFILIATE SINCE 1999


PWTorch is customized for your mobile phone such as your Blackberry. Just enter www.pwtorch.com on your phone's browser and choose the "Mobile" option. Samsung Omnia II users, download our free Widget. Apple iPhone users, download our free PWTorch App (search "pwtorch")



 

KELLER'S TAKE

KELLER: Latest amendments to WWE Wellness Policy render it potentially pointless (Feb. 28, 2008)

Mar 18, 2009 - 9:48:10 AM


By Wade Keller, PWTorch editor

This Week with Wade Keller
Headline: How big are the loopholes in WWE's policy?
Originally Published: February 28, 2008
PWTorch Newsletter #1013


WWE officials touted the company's Wellness Policy last year. They said it was evolving and being amended to make it stronger and to protect wrestlers. I wanted to see those amendments. I had the original policy, but I didn't know what those changes were. Recently, WWE put a link to the complete policy rather than the abridged "press release" version which contained just highlights that had been available on the main corporate webpage previously.

The policy has been amended four times since it was initially released. The first change, dated June 13, 2006, added a couple pharmaceutical drugs to the banned substance list.

The Second Amendment, dated Aug. 21, 2006, stated that talent that was suspended for either 30 or 60 days could be "required, in WWE's sole discretion, to work televised events and pay-per-views."

The Third Amendment, dated May 16, 2007, just over a month before the Benoit Family Tragedy put WWE's policy back on the media radar, added the following:

"In the event of an initial positive result for drugs prohibited by this Policy, the Talent shall be fined an amount equal to 30 days’ pay deducted from your downside guarantee on a weekly basis. The Company may, at its discretion, schedule the Talent to work selected televised events without pay, pay-per-views with pay, and non-televised live events with a $200 stipend per event during the 30 day suspension period."

In the case of a second offense, the same applied - adding a potential requirement to work house shows with a $200 stipend - plus noted that if an individual needed rehab, " the Talent shall not be assigned to work until the individual has successfully completed the drug rehabilitation program. However, regardless of the length of the program, the Talent’s fine shall be limited to 60 days’ pay."

The Fourth Amendment (the last to date) added marijuana to the list of substances that could be tested for, but excluded it from the standard suspensions, instead noting that talent would be fined $1,000 per failure, deducted from the talent's downside guarantee. There are no suspensions or potential termination tied to repeated failures. Previously marijuana was only tested for on a "reasonable cause" basis. Alcohol remains a "reasonable cause only" test.

Did you catch all of that? Basically, the drug policy boils down to this now: If you get caught taking banned substances three times, your contract will be terminated. Try not to let that happen. The first two times you fail, you may or may not be punished much; it's up to us.

There is almost nothing binding to the first two failures, and even the third failure requiring termination has one big loophole. Let's start with that.

If a talent fails three drug tests, their contract is terminated. Yeah. So? How long is it before that wrestler can be brought back? Two years? Six months? Two months? Two weeks? A day? Two hours? It doesn't say.

Just going by the wording of this policy, if a fictional wrestling organization adopted the same policy, and its owner felt drug testing was silly, steroids and supplements weren't that harmful, and nobody should be telling any adults what to do anyway, this policy would allow the owner - after terminating the contract of his top, massively muscular wrestler who was taking loads of steroids and failed the test three times - to rehire him after a two week vacation in Europe - with a raise!

How would anyone - media, fans, other wrestlers, stock holders, Congress - know whether that was happening? They wouldn't. There's nothing in the amendments to the policy or the policy itself stating that policy failures will be made public 100 percent of the time. WWE said they would do that last fall, but it's not in this policy, and for all we know WWE has or could in the future not reveal all suspensions. Without a public announcement of 100 percent of drug test failures, there's no way to be sure wrestlers aren't failing three times, having their contract terminated, and being rehired days or hours later with no one being the wiser.

Let's go back to the other amendments. WWE does not want drug test failures to get in the way of drawing money. They may argue it's to protect the fans from paying for one thing and receiving less. Either way, after a wrestler gets suspended the first or second time, they aren't really suspended at all. They can continue to work every single event they would have anyway - house shows, TV events, and PPV events. The Third Amendment granted them pay for working house shows. Just $200, which for all I know is to cover themselves legally should the wrestler get hurt while being forced to work for nothing during a suspension.

The Third Amendment also now allows suspended wrestlers to work a pay-per-view event with pay. So the punishment now for being suspended is working a few house shows for $200 instead of the usual range of roughly $500 to $5,000 per event, but otherwise no missed TV time to promote and develop their character, no missed PPVs which accounts in the cases of top acts for huge chunks of their annual aggregate pay, and no public (or even backstage among colleagues) knowledge of the suspension - per the written policy. That's soft. Very soft. Especially when taking into account how WWE pays it wrestlers.

WWE wrestlers aren't paid like NBA players. NBA players, as in other pro team sports, receive a guaranteed salary for the season, with some having incentives built in. When an athlete is suspended, it's for a certain number of games, and their salary is deducted based on 1/82nd of their pay in an 82 game season. There is no way for that athlete to make up that lost income. Because of salary caps, a team can't "overpay" a star athlete next year or with his next contract because that could damage the team's ability to sign players to keep them competitive, and thus hurt their attendance and TV ratings. A suspended player absolutely loses substantial salary, plus potentially endorsement deals and fan adulation.

In WWE's case, it's totally up to WWE management whether that wrestler ends up actually punished by the end of the year. WWE salaries aren't public. So if a wrestler was receiving on average over the course of a typical month $2,000 per house show for six house shows, and is paid instead $200 per house show for six house shows in a "suspension month," the following month - after the suspension - WWE could pay that wrestler $3,800 per house show for six house shows, making up for the lost income the previous month.

A promoter who wanted a paper policy for p.r. reasons, but didn't want to have to enforce any of the policy, especially among its coddled top stars, would like this policy. Especially since the policy now dictates that suspended wrestlers can be called upon to work a scheduled PPV match "with pay." Full pay. And they stay on TV. No chance of "losing their spot" to an emerging star or losing momentum in a feud. No chance of peer pressure discouraging drug use, either. If a suspended wrestler had to drop out of a lucrative, ratings-drawing storyline, his colleagues would be affected adversely as it could cost them money if business went down. That peer pressure could lead to self-policing before drug tests caught the wrestler. That incentive is gone under this set-up.

Their deduction in pay is even less than the above scenario in most cases. Most wrestlers earn more than their downside guarantee. The fines are only 30 days worth of their downside guarantee. So a wrestler with a $365,000 downside guarantee who was actually earning triple that in a good year would be fined not 30 days' pay, but the equivalent of 10 days' pay - which could be easily made up with the promoter arbitrarily paying a little more than he would have otherwise for the next handful of house shows or PPVs. WWE's pay is informal, based on a loose formula with substantial discretion by the promoter. If the promoter is upset with the wrestler for failing a test, the punishment can be more severe - 30 days downside lost, plus being pulled from a PPV and TV events (and future PPVs, actually), but forced to work house shows for a $200 stipend, with no make-good informal increases in pay later. But if the promoter liked the wrestler and felt the drug they tested positive for wasn't a big deal, but was on the policy for p.r. reasons, that wrestler could be put in a position to lose absolutely nothing.

On a third failure, the wrestler's contact can be terminated, but he could be rehired an hour later with a new contract. With a raise, even!

In other words, the policy means nothing. Absolutely nothing, at least as written. It's up to the promoter to enforce it honestly. But what's the need for a policy then, other than p.r.? All this policy does it give a promoter the right to terminate a contract of a wrestler after three failures and cut his pay in the mean time, or not. That's it. The rest is fluff if the promoter so chooses. It sounds good, but based on how WWE pays its talent, it means nothing. Adding PPVs with pay into the mix is a telling move.

It's the sports equivalent of an NFL star being suspended for two games, but being allowed to play those games, but without pay, except they can be "bonused" the pay they lost at the end of the season. If they fail three times, they contract is terminated, but the team reserves the right to rehire them the next day, perhaps with a raise, even!

Is anyone in the mainstream media or Congress, whom this policy is meant to impress, going to notice these loopholes? Probably not. If you know nothing about how WWE pays its talent, or how a loss of 30 or 60 days of TV time is more threatening to a lot of millionaire talents with egos and an addiction to fame than a deduction in pay, then this policy looks pretty strict, comparable to other sports. It could be, but it doesn't have to be. The leeway is incredible.

There's a simple answer to this. WWE could add a Fifth Amendment putting in writing that suspensions will be made public each and every time there is a failure. And add that talents who fail three times will have their contracts terminated AND not be rehired for a period of at least X amount of time, say, two years. That amounts to a two year suspension, and that may or may not be seen as enough, but at least it'd be something that could be compared to pro sports.

As far as wrestlers working while suspended, that should be changed. The fans know that an advertised star may miss an event. NHL fans know when they buy season tickets, a star player may be suspended that they wanted to see. That's part of the deal and everyone accepts it. The risk of disappointing fans is part of the teeth of any policy that deters an athlete from breaking the policy and deters the team from conducting business in a way that encourages the use of banned drugs.

The other way to fix these loopholes is to disclose all suspensions and all salaries to an independent third party, assigned by Congress, which would make sure the policy was enforced evenly across the board and that there weren't oddities in how talents were paid after suspensions compared to before. Without that, the policy is, for all intents and purposes, pointless. Any wrestler knows if he's in good standing with the promoter, he risks nothing. No lost TV time. No loss in aggregate pay. No public humiliation. Nothing.

WWE's drug testing policy is an honor system. The independent drug testing agency has nothing to do with how suspensions and fines are executed, so their "independence" is irrelevant beyond randomly testing people and reporting failures. It's all up to Vince McMahon how anyone is actually punished.

Lower card wrestlers may be suspended when they fail to be made an example of. Main event wrestlers, if they read this policy closely, can rest comfortably that if McMahon chooses to, he can protect them without technically violating the written policy in any substantive way.


Send feedback on this article to pwtorch@gmail.com and we'll regularly publish reader feedback in the "Torch Feedback" category on the Main Listing.

For more BREAKING NEWS on WWE, TNA...
VISIT OUR AFFILIATE - PROWRESTLING.NET

For UFC & MMA NEWS & BLOGS:
VISIT OUR SISTER SITE - MMATORCH.COM

Upgrade to PWTorch VIP:

 DETAILS & SIGN-UP INFO (VIP Newsletter, Audio, Archives, No Ads on Website, VIP Email Reports, VIP Forum, more.)

More Recent KELLER'S TAKE Articles
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

(c) 1999-2010 TDH Communications Inc. - All rights reserved.

STAFF PICKS - TOP TEN RECENT ARTICLES
WWE NEWS: Raw TV Ratings are in - post-Rumble studio show jumps to highest rating since WrestleMania
WWE NEWS: Fast Lane PPV - main event and big face-to-face confrontation announced for February PPV
CALDWELL'S WWE RAW TV REPORT 1/26: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of replacement show for snowed-out Raw - Lesnar & Reigns confrontation, D-Bryan sit-down interview, more
RUMBLE NEWS & NOTES: Rock's role, crowd response to Rumble winner, Bully Ray returns & other surprise entrants, WWE sets up Cena's next feud, no Orton, more
CALDWELL'S ROYAL RUMBLE PPV REPORT 1/25: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of Lesnar vs. Cena vs. Rollins for WWE Title, Royal Rumble, post-PPV Network show



PWTORCH FREE AUDIO SHOWS
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (1/27) now available on-demand - Wade Keller & Jason Powell of Prowrestling.net
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (1/26) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant
LIVECAST AUDIO: Special PWTorch Livecast (1/25) following Royal Rumble now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Friday PWTorch Livecast (1/23) now available - Caldwell's Royal Rumble Predictions Show
LIVECAST AUDIO: "Stone Cold" Steve Austin live interview w/Wade Keller (now available on-demand)
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (1/21) now available - Pat McNeill & Jim Valley

PWTORCH INSTANT POLL
RAW POLL 1/26: What did you think of Monday's non-arena blizzard show?
 
pollcode.com free polls


RAW POLL 1/26: How do you feel about Roman Reigns in the WM main event after Raw?
 
pollcode.com free polls
RUMBLE POLL 1/25: Vote on Sunday's Royal Rumble PPV
 
pollcode.com free polls


RUMBLE POLL 1/25: What was the Best Rumble PPV match?
 
pollcode.com free polls


RUMBLE POLL 1/25: What's your reaction to Roman Reigns winning the Royal Rumble?
 
pollcode.com free polls
SD POLL 1/22: Friday's show was...
 
pollcode.com free polls


SD POLL 1/22: What was the best match on Smackdown?
 
pollcode.com free polls
VOTE IN OR SEE RESULTS OF PREVIOUS POLLS

UPCOMING MAJOR EVENTS

SELECT LIST OF ARTICLES BY CATEGORY

ARTICLES GROUPED BY CATEGORY
NEWS REPORTS
WWE NETWORK: Wednesday, January 28 Schedule
WED. SCHEDULE: Randy Orton appearance pre-TV return, NXT Contract Signing, Lucha Underground marathon
WWE NEWS: Updated line-up for Thursday's live Smackdown - WWE Champ off, Casket match, Cena, Orton?, more
TNA NEWS: TNA returning to Orlando - 12 dates announced for Impact, PPV & Xplosion tapings
WWE STOCK: Stock Price hits year-high on Network news
WWE NEWS: Raw TV Ratings are in - post-Rumble studio show jumps to highest rating since WrestleMania
TNA NEWS: Updated Impact TV ratings - Weeks 1 & 2 Friday nights on Destination America
WWE NEWS: Break Down of Network subscriber count based on new information - unofficial Network total, domestic vs. int'l, more
WWE NEWS: WWE announces 1.0 million Network subscribers
RAW SOCIAL MEDIA: Twitter TV Rating for snowed-out Raw
HOF NEWS: Former Women's champion Beth Phoenix announced for Waterloo Hall of Fame
WWE NETWORK: Tuesday, January 27 Schedule
PPV REPORTS
CALDWELL'S ROYAL RUMBLE PPV REPORT 1/25: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of Lesnar vs. Cena vs. Rollins for WWE Title, Royal Rumble, post-PPV Network show
MCNEILL'S PPV BLOG 1/25: Live Blog for WWE Royal Rumble - ongoing thoughts & observations
CALDWELL'S ROYAL RUMBLE PPV REPORT 1/25 (Pre-Show): Rock at the Rumble teaser, Cesaro & Kidd vs. New Day
RADICAN'S EVOLVE 36 IPPV REPORT: Drew Galloway vs. Roderick Strong grudge match, DGUSA champ Johnny Gargano, Flash match, So Cal Val, more; plus Overall Score
NJPW TOKYO DOME SUMMARY 1/4: Poll Results, Match Times, Title Changes, full match results, more
RADICAN'S NJPW "Wrestling Kingdom 9" PPV report 1/4 - Nakamura-Ibushi & Okada-Tanahashi blowaway MOTYC's, excellent undercard featuring Styles-Naito, Makabe-Ishii
CALDWELL'S NJPW TOKYO DOME SHOW RESULTS 1/4: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of live Wrestle Kingdom PPV - Tanahashi vs. Okada, Bullet Club, Nakamura, Jim Ross, more
KYGHT'S PPV EVALUATION: Survivor Series, TLC & Final Battle, plus the Final 2014 PPV Rankings - which PPV tops the list?
RADICAN'S NJPW King of Pro Wrestling PPV Report 10/6 - Okada-Naito #1 Contender match, Insane Three-way Tag for Jr. Tag Titles, Styles-Tanahashi IWGP Title main event
RADICAN'S CHIKARA "Tomorrow Never Dies" iPPV Report 12/6: Torneo Cibernetico match, Throwbacks vs. Devastation Corp. 2/3 Falls match for tag titles, Icarus-Deucalion Steel Cage main event
CALDWELL'S WWE TLC PPV REPORT 12/14: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of Cena vs. Rollins, Roman Reigns involved, Ambrose vs. Wyatt, set-up for the Royal Rumble, more
CALDWELL'S WWE TLC PPV REPORT 12/14 (Pre-Show): Royal Rumble main event announced, New Day vs. Rhodes Bros., more
TV REPORTS
CALDWELL'S WWE RAW TV REPORT 1/26: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of replacement show for snowed-out Raw - Lesnar & Reigns confrontation, D-Bryan sit-down interview, more
METZGER'S ROH TV REPORT 1/25: Alberto Del Rio (El Patron) debut match vs. Daniels, ODB joins Briscoes, more
JAMES'S WWE SUPERSTARS REPORT 1/23: Final WWE show pre-Rumble features Sin Cara vs. Fandango, Cameron vs. Naomi
RADICAN'S NEW JAPAN TV ON AXS BLOG 1/23 (Eps. 2 & 3): Tanahashi-Okada feud highlighted, incredible presentation, more
RADICAN'S NJPW TV REPORT 1/16: Complete rundown of incredible one-hour show focused on Tanahashi-Okada from WK7
PARKS'S WWE SMACKDOWN REPORT 1/22: Ongoing "virtual time" coverage of the Thursday show, including Daniel Bryan vs. Kane in a No-DQ Match
JAMES'S WWE NXT REPORT 1/21 - Week 136: Zayn-Owens announced for next "Takeover" special, #1 contender tournament begins, Charlotte defends Women's Title; Overall Reax
DEHNEL'S LUCHA UNDERGROUND REPORT 1/21: Last Luchador Standing main event, Big Ryck, more Lucha stars
DEHNEL'S WWE MAIN EVENT RESULTS 1/20: Wyatt vs. Swagger main event from Tuesday's TV taping for non-Network airing
TV REPORT - 1/20 Santino's Royal Rumble Lottery Spectacular: Replacement for Main Event features Santino's history lesson
RAW SHOW SUMMARY 1/19: Poll Results on top Legend, Match Times, Title implications, full results, more
CALDWELL'S WWE RAW RESULTS 1/19: Complete "virtual-time" coverage of live Raw - final Rumble hype, big "Legends Reunion" theme, Brock Lesnar, Bryan's Raw in-ring return, more
OPINION & ANALYSIS
RADICAN'S KAYFABE COMMENTARIES REVIEW SERIES: "Back to the Territories: Mid South" - Watts as a leader, expansion of territory, grueling road schedule, road stories, more
RAW POLLS 1/26: Vote 0-10 and Reigns post-Rumble
CALDWELL: WWE faces divided fanbase headed to WM31 - how can WWE make Roman Reigns work for everyone?
RUMBLE REAX #3: Live perspective on Rumble taking air out of the building, plus Rollins's performance, undercard, more
ROYAL RUMBLE REAX #2: High praise for WWE Title match, including Seth's star-confirming role, plus Reigns angst
ROYAL RUMBLE PPV REAX #1: "No long-winded statement to make; I just spoke with my wallet instead"
RUMBLE PPV POLLS: Vote 0-10, Best Match, Rumble Winner
MCNEILL'S PPV BLOG 1/25: Live Blog for WWE Royal Rumble - ongoing thoughts & observations
Sufferin' Succotash, Son: McNEILL Previews WWE Royal Rumble 2015! (with a Wrestling History Lesson)
ASK THE SPECIALISTS ROUNDTABLE: How about this scenario for The Undertaker returning in the Rumble?
CALDWELL: WWE offers "inside look" at Daniel Bryan/WM30 Creative process, but what were the real messages?
SD POLLS 1/22: Vote on Smackdown 0-10 & Best Match
THE SPECIALISTS
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Action Figure Spotlight - New Toy for WWE HOF'er Arnold Schwarzenegger
TUCKER LIVE AT THE RUMBLE: Instant Reaction to "Defiant WWE Booking" Year Two
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: WWE vs. UFC Trading Cards - Comparing Card Values of Today's Rising Stars
HITS & MISSES - 1/22 WWE Smackdown: Opening Segment, Rumble Qualifiers, Ryback-Rusev, Show Closing Brawl
HITS & MISSES - 1/19 WWE Raw: Wyatt-Bryan, Legends, NWO, Ambrose-Barrett, Final Segment - Cena, Rollins, Sting, Lesnar
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Action Figure Spotlight - Royal Rumble Favorite Daniel Bryan's History of Figures
DONOFRIO'S FALLS COUNT ANYWHERE: The Case for Daniel Bryan, WWE HOF candidates, more!
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Do Card Collectors Still Believe in Roman Reigns?, A Review of the Rumble to Rumble Stretch
HITS & MISSES - 1/15 WWE Smackdown: Bryan vs. Kane, Rumble Hype, Heyman - Rollins, Six-Man Tag
VALLEY'S TAKE: "Wrestling with Death"
COLLECTIBLES COLUMN: Randy Savage Action Figure Spotlight - Savage’s Top 5 Opponents
HITS & MISSES - 1/12 WWE Raw: Cena vs. Rollins, Ambrose's Psych Evals, Bryan, Reigns's Fairytale, Contract Signing
PWTORCH EXCLUSIVES
RADICAN'S KAYFABE COMMENTARIES REVIEW SERIES: "Back to the Territories: Mid South" - Watts as a leader, expansion of territory, grueling road schedule, road stories, more
RUMBLE FLASHBACK - Last Year's PPV: C.M. Punk #1 in the Rumble for his final WWE match, crowd rejects Batista's win, Bryan vs. Wyatt, Lesnar's path of destruction begins, more
JAN. 24 RUMBLE HISTORY: McMahon wins 1999 Rumble, Rock & Foley have sickening I Quit match
EXCLUSIVE: Stone Cold goes inside the Royal Rumble process, plus does he want someone to break his record?
JAN. 23 RUMBLE HISTORY: The Rock wins 2000 Royal Rumble, Tazz makes memorable debut vs. Angle, more
JAN. 22 RUMBLE HISTORY: Shawn Michaels wins Rumble 20 years ago, but does not main-event WrestleMania XI
JAN. 21 RUMBLE HISTORY: Steve Austin wins third Royal Rumble, sets up WWF Title match at WM17
RAW RETRO: DX & Hornswoggle in Raw TV main event 5 yrs. ago, Cena & Kofi, Napoleon Dynamite, more
SMACKDOWN FLASHBACK - 15 yrs. ago: Hunter & X-Pac vs. Rock & Show, Hardys, E&C, Jericho, Lawler on commentary, more
EXCLUSIVE: Lanny Poffo reveals Randy Savage's stipulations for Hall of Fame induction (December 2011)
RAW RETRO - 5 yrs. ago: Mike Tyson guest-hosts & wrestles, plus build-up to 2010 Royal Rumble PPV
ECW PPV FLASHBACK - Guilty as Charged 15 yrs. ago: RVD vs. Sabu, Dusty Rhodes, Impact Players, Awesome defends ECW Title
REFERENCE
WWE NEWS: Raw TV Ratings are in - post-Rumble studio show jumps to highest rating since WrestleMania
TNA NEWS: Updated Impact TV ratings - Weeks 1 & 2 Friday nights on Destination America
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings for last Monday's "Legends Reunion" show - Raw crosses 3.0 benchmark
WWE NEWS: Smackdown TV ratings - Week 1 & 2 performance back on Thursday nights
TITLES & CHAMPS: Ongoing list of 2015 Titleholders
WWE NEWS: Total Divas viewership - Week 3 first-time event
WWE NEWS: Raw TV ratings are in for Monday's show - how did Raw fare vs. College Football Title game?
WWE NEWS: Total Divas TV ratings - Week 2 viewership
WWE NEWS: Raw TV rating for final show of 2014 - finale drops to 2.5 rating, plus viewership break down
LUCHA NEWS: TV ratings for Lucha Underground "season premiere" on El Rey Network
TNA NEWS: Impact TV ratings are in - full break down of the first episode on Destination America, including replay
OBITS: Wrestler who played "The Zombie" on first WWECW episode reportedly dies
PWTorch Free Podcast
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (1/27) now available on-demand - Wade Keller & Jason Powell of Prowrestling.net
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (1/26) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant
LIVECAST AUDIO: Special PWTorch Livecast (1/25) following Royal Rumble now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Friday PWTorch Livecast (1/23) now available - Caldwell's Royal Rumble Predictions Show
LIVECAST AUDIO: "Stone Cold" Steve Austin live interview w/Wade Keller (now available on-demand)
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (1/21) now available - Pat McNeill & Jim Valley
LIVECAST AUDIO: Tuesday PWTorch Livecast (1/20) now available - Wade Keller & Jason Powell of Prowrestling.net
LIVECAST AUDIO: Monday PWTorch Livecast (1/19) now available - Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant
PWTORCH LIVECAST LOG: This week's interviews with Lanny Poffo (brother of Randy Savage) & WWE 2K15 developers
LIVECAST AUDIO: Lanny Poffo talks live w/Keller on Friday's PWTorch Livecast (now available on-demand)
LIVECAST AUDIO: Thursday PWTorch Livecast (1/15) now available - James Caldwell & Greg Parks
LIVECAST AUDIO: Wednesday PWTorch Livecast (1/14) now available - WWE 2K15 developers w/McNeill & Radican
VIP Exclusive Features
2015 PWTORCH VIP SALE: Become a VIP member today for just $2.15 - save nearly 80 percent on regular rate - details here
VIP - 01/27 - Wade Keller Hotline - The News: WWE Network 1 Million Subscription Announcement, WWE stock, Raw Ratings, TNA ratings, TNA TV tapings, Beth Phoenix honored, SD main event, Barbed Wire City (31 min.)
VIP - 01/27 PWTorch Livecast & VIP Aftershow AD FREE: Keller & Powell discuss the Royal Rumble fallout including a unique and successful reformatted Raw, plus WWE Network hits 1 million subscribers, live callers and emails (139 min.)
VIP - 01/27 Audio Flashback - Guttman Audio Show (01-25-2005): Batista’s comments about Smackdown and Triple H, what Hunter is and what he thinks he is, VIP Moment of Insanity, Sad State of Tag Division, more (27 min.)
VIP - 01/26 PWTorch Livecast: Bruce Mitchell & Travis Bryant: Rumble fall-out, snowed-out Raw, how Reigns went from cool Shield member to representing fan resentment, canceled Network subs, more! (72 min.)
VIP - 01/26 - Wade Keller Hotline - The News: The Monday Without Raw, Update on rescheduling and is it for best, a better Rumble-WM scenario with Bryan, Bryan’s reaction, #CancelWWENetwork, Lesnar’s schedule, Polls, Arnold (31 min.)
VIP - 01/25 WWE Royal Rumble Post-PPV Audio Roundtable: Keller, Mitchell, McNeill discuss complete fan rejection of Roman Reigns, Bryan’s elimination, stellar Lesnar-Rollins-Cena match, DDP and Dudley surprises, more (80 min.)
VIP - 01/25 Special PWTorch Livecast: Royal Rumble post-game show - James Caldwell & Greg Parks talk w/live callers, including several live reports from Philly, plus how does WWE "make it right" heading into WM31? (140 min.)
VIP - 01/25 - Wade Keller Hotline - The News: Weekend wrap-up including WWE Supershow with Reigns moved to tag match, Ryback and Jericho over huge, Gabriel gone from WWE and teases getting high right away, Rock (15 min.)
VIP - 01/25 Bruce Mitchell Audio Show, pt. 2: Bischoff-Hogan-Flair dynamic in WCW behind the scenes, Reigns’s big picture marketability, Lord Alfred Hayes, Tuesday Night Titan Lou Thesz, Kevin Sullivan, Coach K (51 min.)
VIP - 01/25 McNeill & Valley's "Wayback Playback" Audio Show (ep. #19): Into the WWF Time Machine for Hour #2 of the 1988 Royal Rumble (46 min.)
VIP - 01/25 Audio Flashback - VIP Audio Roundtable: Keller, Mitchell, McNeill discuss whether Cena showing signs of being franchise player, Batista’s proclamation that Triple H is greatest ever, should Eddie turn heel, TNA PPV (61 min.)