{"id":44010,"date":"2017-06-22T16:35:43","date_gmt":"2017-06-22T21:35:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/?p=44010"},"modified":"2017-06-23T16:47:41","modified_gmt":"2017-06-23T21:47:41","slug":"five-count-ramifications-awful-finishes-womens-revolution-styles-nakamura-mike-maria-title-prestige","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/2017\/06\/22\/five-count-ramifications-awful-finishes-womens-revolution-styles-nakamura-mike-maria-title-prestige\/","title":{"rendered":"FIVE COUNT: Ramifications of awful finishes, Women&#8217;s Revolution, Styles-Nakamura, Mike &#038; Maria, Title Prestige"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"pwtor-1804648572\" class=\"pwtor-before-content pwtor-entity-placement\"><hr \/><b>SPOTLIGHTED PODCAST ALERT (YOUR ARTICLE BEGINS A FEW INCHES DOWN)... <\/b>\r\n\r\n<iframe src=\"https:\/\/widget.spreaker.com\/player?show_id=3076978&theme=light&playlist=false&playlist-continuous=false&autoplay=false&live-autoplay=false&chapters-image=true&episode_image_position=right&hide-logo=false&hide-likes=false&hide-comments=false&hide-sharing=false&hide-download=true\" width=\"100%\" height=\"140px\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe>\r\n<hr \/><\/div><p>Quick lesson for all the wrestlers in WWE reading this; if you want to have any success in WWE, be the bad guy. If you\u2019re a good guy, then there\u2019s this binding spell that turns you into not only a complete idiot but a complete loser of an idiot. Not only will you lose all your matches, but you\u2019ll lose them in embarrassing fashion that makes people look at you and just shake your head.<\/p>\n<p>While you\u2019re at it, get yourself an entourage of geeks to assist you in winning all of your matches. You might get some dirty looks from a few people, but don\u2019t worry about them; you\u2019re standing tall winning titles and making money. They\u2019re not looking at you with disgust, it\u2019s envy disguised as disgust. They just wish they had the winner\u2019s mentality that you have. And let\u2019s face it, you gotta do what you gotta do, right Book?<\/p>\n<p>So don\u2019t be hometown hero Randy Orton looking for revenge; aspire to be like Jinder Mahal and get yourself an entourage so your opponent falls for the same trick twice in a row. Don\u2019t be like The New Day playing by the rules; aspire to be like The Usos where if you feel like you\u2019re in danger of losing your titles, just walk out and laugh at the good guys sat in the ring with their hands on their head watching as their title shot opportunity just strolls away from them. Aspire to be like Carmella and get yourself someone to do the hard work for you.<\/p>\n<p>Heck, start planning ahead for the Royal Rumble now by forming yourself a little stable of minions who won\u2019t be in the match; get two of them to guard you in the corner and get the rest to throw everyone else out of the match until you\u2019re the last one left. Don\u2019t take inspiration from a guy like A.J. Styles who has become a perennial loser since becoming a good guy, take guidance from the successful work that the likes of Carmella &amp; James Ellsworth, The Usos, Jinder Mahal, and Baron Corbin are all doing.<\/p>\n<p>On a slightly less tongue-in-cheek note, let\u2019s move onto the Five Lessons To Be Learned From Money In The Bank 2017, looking at what can be learned from the damage done by all these god-awful finishes and a couple of positive takeaways from the show regarding the future of Smackdown.<\/p>\n<p><b>(1) The Women\u2019s Revolution Is Losing Trust<\/b><\/p>\n<p>So far, 2017 has been a rough year for the oxymoronic self-proclaimed Women\u2019s Revolution. After an initial bad start with Queen Steph placing everyone into teams for STABLE WARS!, the women really started making strides in 2016 in terms of being taken seriously as a featured part of the show and delivering quality. In particular, the Charlotte vs. Sasha matches really helped to not only put them on the map, but put them on the map as a valuable commodity.<\/p>\n<p>So far, 2017 hasn\u2019t had anything to shout and rave about as far as the women are concerned about, though. Coming at a time when WWE is trying to change the perception of women\u2019s wrestling, reverting back to the standard of sub-par matches with awful booking will do more damage than it\u2019s ever done before because it\u2019s coming at a time when you\u2019re trying to get viewers to buy into change. If you\u2019re watching from inside the WWE bubble and don\u2019t watch NXT, then what\u2019s being presented on Raw and Smackdown is what\u2019s going to shape their perceptions of women\u2019s wrestling, perceptions that once they\u2019re formed are hard to undo.<\/p><div id=\"pwtor-4274412604\" class=\"pwtor-content pwtor-entity-placement\"><div align=\"center\" data-freestar-ad=\"__336x280 __336x280\" id=\"pwtorchcom_test_300x250\">\r\n  <script data-cfasync=\"false\" type=\"text\/javascript\">\r\n    freestar.config.enabled_slots.push({ placementName: \"pwtorchcom_test_300x250\", slotId: \"pwtorchcom_test_300x250\" });\r\n  <\/script>\r\n<\/div><\/div>\n<p>Over on Raw this year we\u2019ve had the total failure that has been Bayley, Sasha Banks has spent the year as a third wheel in everyone else\u2019s program, and, despite Alexa Bliss\u2019s great character work, her matches aren\u2019t reinforcing the idea that the women\u2019s match on a PPV is something to expect greater things from nowadays. Smackdown has at least had a bit more going for their women\u2019s division in a creative sense and while giving the division extra screen time and credibility is a good thing. There\u2019s just not the in-ring quality to get people unfamiliar with NXT excited about women\u2019s wrestling on the big shows.<\/p>\n<p>Money in the Bank was another in a growing line of significant blows to the credibility of the Women\u2019s Revolution, especially through the eyes of those locked inside the WWE bubble. After Backlash I wrote about the importance of the end product matching the hype in regards to Shinsuke Nakamura\u2019s debut and that lesson would have been a great one to factor into the booking of the Money in the Bank match. Doing a terrible anti-climactic finish in a match like Naomi vs. Lana which has low expectations is one thing, but it becomes exponentially worse in a match that you\u2019ve built up as being historically important which\u00a0 you\u2019ve allowed fans to expect will be a great match.<\/p>\n<p>Charlotte vs. Sasha aside, the women\u2019s matches have been one disappointment after another and there\u2019s only so much goodwill that fans have before they start to lose trust in the women being able to deliver. Once the trust goes, so does the ability to make money. Becky and Alexa didn\u2019t deliver in their pair of gimmick matches, Alexa and Naomi couldn\u2019t have a good match, both of the women\u2019s matches at WrestleMania were disappointing, Bayley vs. Alexa has been a mess, and the Women\u2019s Division on Smackdown still feels stuck in first gear since the Superstar Shake-Up. There\u2019s only so long that trend can continue on for before people start deciding that Charlotte vs. Sasha was an anomaly and that nothing has actually changed.<\/p>\n<p>The double shot of the Money in the Bank match being a major let-down and the Smackdown Women&#8217;s Championship match being a poor showing involving two women who are great until you ask them to actually work a match does nothing to help mask the issue either. Lana\u2019s an asset and she should absolutely be a featured part of Smackdown, but she isn\u2019t a wrestler, she can\u2019t wrestle, and she shouldn\u2019t be wrestling.<\/p>\n<p>Putting someone like Lana in the title match just reminds people of the way things used to be rather than showing everyone the new way that things are going to be as part of the \u201crevolution.\u201d The last thing you want in a revolution seeking positive change is to be reminding everyone of the ways things used to be that you\u2019re trying to move away from. People who aren\u2019t on board with the new era of women\u2019s wrestling will see Naomi vs Lana as the title match on a PPV and understandably just assume that nothing has really changed because the hot girl in the skimpy outfit is still doing a poor job of pretending to be a wrestler.<\/p>\n<p>Revolution\u2019s don\u2019t get over by just telling everyone what the revolution is; they get over by showing what is. That\u2019s how it got over in NXT. WWE is doing a heck of a lot of telling when it comes to the women, but the actual showing part has been consistently missing and, without it, it\u2019s just empty hype that kills the credibility of the promotion and the trust within the viewer.<\/p>\n<p><b>(2) Awful Finishes Put Heat On The Promotion, Not The Heels<\/b><\/p>\n<p>People aren\u2019t looking at the finishes to the first two matches on the show and thinking, &#8220;God damn James Ellsworth &amp; Carmella, I can\u2019t wait to see Charlotte, Becky, and Naomi give them the ass kicking they\u2019ve got coming to them after that&#8221; (mostly because the babyface kicking ass hahahahaha if we don\u2019t laugh we\u2019ll cry). And nobody needs to see The New Day get their rematch with The Usos to stop them from bailing like scared cowards again.<\/p><div id=\"pwtor-3773701367\" class=\"pwtor-content-1 pwtor-entity-placement\"><!-- Tag ID: pwtorchcom_test_300x600 -->\r\n<div align=\"center\" data-freestar-ad=\"__336x280 __300x600\" id=\"pwtorchcom_test_300x600\">\r\n  <script data-cfasync=\"false\" type=\"text\/javascript\">\r\n    freestar.config.enabled_slots.push({ placementName: \"pwtorchcom_test_300x600\", slotId: \"pwtorchcom_test_300x600\" });\r\n  <\/script>\r\n<\/div><\/div>\n<p>Both of those finishes were flat. The heels weren\u2019t getting heckled out of the place, the crowd wasn\u2019t chanting in anger. Even the babyfaces weren\u2019t doing their part in putting the heat for the decision on the heel. Instead, they all just stare at the more resourceful heels like, Damn, why didn\u2019t I think of doing that, you win this one old foe! The amount of heat for the heels to get for garbage &#8220;nobody-wins\/nobody-loses&#8221; finishes like them are very minimal, but that very minimal amount of heat will only be gained by the babyfaces putting over the dastardly act. If they don\u2019t convey outraged and angry emotions, then no positives are going to be gained from garbage finishes.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, all these awful finishes just put heat on the promotion and contribute towards viewers losing faith in the product delivering satisfying conclusions. There isn\u2019t any heat for them and, whatever perceived \u201cheat\u201d there is, isn\u2019t the heat you want. The \u201cthis is bullshit\u201d type of reaction in a way is \u201cheat,\u201d but there\u2019s nothing positive you can do with it. It\u2019s just \u201cYou\u2019re pissing me off and wasting my time with this\u201d heat that goes towards the promotion and heat towards the promotion is when you start losing (even more) viewers.<\/p>\n<p>Patience and trust aren\u2019t endless resources. We all have our breaking point. Testing how far you can push that breaking point with paying customers of your product isn\u2019t wise. Now, if finishes like this were in isolation and infrequent occurrences then you can get away with them. The good outweighs the bad, net positive, and so on. But for a lot of people, as far as the current product is concerned, the good doesn\u2019t outweigh the bad, and each of these garbage finishes pokes away that bit more at their patience and it\u2019s reaching breaking point at a faster rate than the rate of new viewers are coming in at.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s the reason promotions could get away with garbage finishes in the past. And yes they absolutely had garbage finishes. The &#8217;80s, in particular, isn\u2019t such a well-revered era for wrestling because of all the brilliant finishes. Most of them, in fact, when you watch them back now are pretty lame. The difference is they weren\u2019t a negative because the good so heavily outweighed the bad. If the heel won via some bullshit finish, the crowds was still hot because they were so invested in not wanting but needing to see the babyface win and the heel lose and they knew that although it didn\u2019t happen this time, sooner or later the babyface would get that revenge. Now it\u2019s just deflating, and without over babyfaces and heels, and without enough goodwill from viewers, the heat for garbage finishes like these don\u2019t go to the heel but to the promotion itself.<\/p>\n<p><b>(3) The Titles Need To Be More Prestigious<\/b><\/p>\n<p>This partly follows on from the previous lesson regarding awful finishes putting heat on the promotion. That wasn\u2019t the only damage done by the garbage finish to the New Day vs The Usos match. Damage was also done to the prestige of the titles. Titles can be and should be a money drawing asset for WWE but they\u2019re not.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019re not even close to it in fact and it\u2019s no wonder when you present a title match and it ends with the champions grabbing their belts and just walking out of the contest and yet they still get to keep calling themselves the champions. The last thing that any wrestling promotion should want is to have people watching their product and thinking it\u2019s a joke with a complete disregard for the credibility needed in any real spectactor sport.<\/p>\n<p>Quite frankly, the stipulation where the champions can retain the titles by getting themselves disqualified or counted out needs to go. \u201cIt\u2019s the way it\u2019s always been\u201d isn\u2019t a valid reason for continuing to present garbage. It makes the product look like a joke, and that\u2019s something you should avoid at all costs. People new to WWE or on the fence about watching aren\u2019t going to see the end to that match and feel like that\u2019s something they want to get invested in.<\/p>\n<p>Championships should be treated like the &#8220;be all and end all.&#8221; The champions themselves should only be the cream of the crop. Just getting a title shot should mean you\u2019re a significant player in that division. Since the Superstar Shake-Up, Smackdown\u2019s titles have really taken a kicking in the prestige department. How are people supposed to buy into them being valuable commodities when in the last two months we\u2019ve seen Lana literally debut into a title match, the comedy team of Breezango get a title match, and jobber-to-the-stars Jinder Mahal even won the top title.<\/p>\n<p>When the bottom players in the division are getting title shots, how is getting a title shot supposed to give a rub to someone else? Likewise, how much of a rub do you expect Baron Corbin to get if or when he wins the World Title? There\u2019s no equity in the belts and, when that\u2019s the case, there\u2019s no value to pass on to whomever holds them. Which essentially makes them useless.<\/p>\n<p><b>(4) A.J. Styles vs. Shinsuke Nakamura Will Be A Big Deal<\/b><\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s hard to call Nakamura a success this far into his run on the main roster, but one big positive to take from his run is that WWE is at least trying to book him as a money-drawing asset. They\u2019re not knocking it out of the park, but you can see that the intention is definitely there. It becomes especially noticeable when that happens so infrequently. Sure, there\u2019s things that are the WWE way that aren\u2019t helping him like having to conform to the generic presentation of promos and matches, but he isn\u2019t trading wins with anyone and he\u2019s constantly being put over by the announcers. They\u2019re self-aware that Nakamura can be a commodity for them and, for Nakamura fans, that\u2019s very promising.<\/p>\n<p>What they\u2019re also evidently self-aware of is the fan demand for a Shinsuke Nakamura vs A.J. Styles match. Ever since Backlash they\u2019ve made a point to consistently pair them off and lay the groundwork for when they do face each other. And I really like that they\u2019re not rushing into it and that they\u2019re planning ahead with it rather than coming up to Summerslam and realizing they have nothing for either guy and just throwing them together. They\u2019re building the seeds of friendship so viewers new to Nakamura understand the bond between the pair and at Money in the Bank they gave you enough of a tease of them together to wet your appetite and need to see more. The fact that they\u2019re doing that shows the intention is for it to be a marquee match because they never start hyping matches multiple PPVs in advance unless it\u2019s for the John Cena\u2019s and Roman Reigns\u2019s of the world.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve seen a lot of people suggesting that it\u2019s building to a match at Summerslam because that\u2019s the next big show and, when you build to a big match, it\u2019s logical to build to it happening at a big show. I wouldn\u2019t. I\u2019d save it for after Summerslam. A.J. vs. Nakamura built up to right and with the slow and deliberate build that they have been giving it can definitely be an added value asset on a PPV.<\/p>\n<p>Summerslam is going to draw just fine without that match, though. It\u2019s a dual-brand show so you have double the star power on top of big matches involving Brock Lesnar and John Cena which not every show gets. Compare that to the Smackdown-exclusive shows and there\u2019s a massive gulf in appeal. Not only for the big shows themselves, but for the TV leading into them.<\/p>\n<p>The aim in the Network era should be to get viewers to pay for the Network on a continuous basis, month after month, not just in certain months for the big shows with loaded line-ups. Getting 100,000 extra people subscribing to the Network to watch the big shows is obviously good, but it\u2019s more valuable to WWE to have a third of that number subscribing month to month throughout the year and, in order for that to happen, they need a reason to need to see the brand exclusive shows.<\/p>\n<p>A.J. vs. Nakamura could be that reason. Put it on Summerslam and it\u2019s probably looking at being the fourth or fifth match from the top and, as a result, it\u2019ll be diminished in importance. Save it for the Smackdown PPV coming out of Summerslam and it\u2019s almost by default the biggest match on that show, will get all the time it needs, and should be a match that can draw extra subscriptions. And that doesn\u2019t mean you can\u2019t still do it on a big show. If done right, the first match should only build anticipation for a rematch which can take place at WrestleMania.<\/p>\n<p>Whenever it happens, the good news for fans of either is that WWE sees it as a big match worthy of building up to way ahead of time. It\u2019s happening, and it\u2019s not going to be some throwaway &#8220;let\u2019s just do it to please the smarks&#8221; type of deal.<\/p>\n<p><b>(5) Mike Kanellis Is Exactly What WWE Needs<\/b><\/p>\n<p>I didn\u2019t like the debut of Maria &amp; Mike Kanellis when I first watched it. Maria\u2019s shouting annoyed me, it was overly soppy, and I hated the fact that they renamed Mike Bennett to Mike Kanellis signalling that she\u2019s the only reason he\u2019s in WWE. Then I thought about it again after the show and the penny dropped. I\u2019d been worked!<\/p>\n<p>Wrestlers like Roderick Strong and Kassius Ohno are great, but the reality is that WWE doesn\u2019t need them. Fan favorites who can have a great match but struggles to get over with a new audience isn\u2019t the type of act that WWE is lacking. Both Raw and Smackdown each have more than enough of them. What WWE are seriously lacking in are mid-card heel acts that aren\u2019t working against crowds cheering for them because they\u2019re cool and witty heels. They need actual heels who the crowd don\u2019t like (but don\u2019t tune out because of) and that can get their babyface opponents over. Another Seth Rollins &#8211; someone who is a great wrestler and is over but not able to break through the glass ceiling over &#8211; isn\u2019t as valuable right now as another Miz is. That\u2019s what they have with this act.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s nothing cool about this act. He isn\u2019t a flashy workrate wrestler who will undermine any heat he gets by popping the crowd during his matches. It\u2019s a proper heel act that, as long as they don\u2019t become too annoying, will get over great as a heel duo. His taking her surname annoyed me at first, but it\u2019s actually a brilliant move. WWE is telling us he\u2019s &#8220;not a real man, you see.&#8221; They&#8217;re implying to us that he\u2019s his wife\u2019s &#8220;little bitch.&#8221; He\u2019s a cuck (although they won&#8217;t put it that way, of course). Taking the wife\u2019s surname, especially when she\u2019s the one with the notoriety and the star power, isn\u2019t a manly move. It\u2019s an awesome heel move, though.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ll be digging into some feelings of pent up aggression inside viewers from their own lives, too. Everyone knows that couple that are so lovey dovey, that just disgust you with their public shows of affection for one another and make you want to wrap your hands around their necks but you can\u2019t because you\u2019re supposed to be their friends. That\u2019s the type of wrestling character that is easy to get heat with from live crowds who take out all that pent-up anger that they can\u2019t display in front of their friend and bombard them with it.<\/p>\n<p>No, it\u2019s not an act that\u2019s going to main event WrestleMania or significantly drive Network subscriptions. They\u2019re role players if you will. Every team needs role players, though. And a roster is a team. You want it to be well-balanced. You don\u2019t want to have an overstock of great Point Guards but then be left with no rim protection. In the same manner, you don\u2019t want to have a roster with a ton of newly introduced babyfaces, that you&#8217;re working hard to get over, with no effective heels to help get them over. The Kanellis\u2019s can be that role player that doesn\u2019t draw a lot of money as an isolated act, but enhances the ability for the team as a whole to become better. Plus, there\u2019s a great babyface turn in it when (not if &#8211; you should have seen that coming Enzo), Mike finally grows a pair.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>NOW CHECK OUT THE PREVIEW COLUMN:\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/2017\/06\/09\/five-count-five-lessons-lessons-pro-wrestling-can-learn-nxt-currently-getting-right\/\">FIVE COUNT: Five Lessons Pro Wrestling Can Learn From What NXT Is Currently Getting Right<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"pwtor-end-article-groups pwtor-entity-placement\" id=\"pwtor-1748792379\"><div id=\"pwtor-2664635401\"><div align=\"center\" data-freestar-ad=\"__336x280\" id=\"pwtorchcom_medrec_3\">\r\n  <script data-cfasync=\"false\" type=\"text\/javascript\">\r\n    freestar.config.enabled_slots.push({ placementName: \"pwtorchcom_medrec_3\", slotId: \"pwtorchcom_medrec_3\" });\r\n  <\/script>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\nTHANK YOU FOR VISITING<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\"><p>Quick lesson for all the wrestlers in WWE reading this; if you want to have any success in WWE, be the bad guy. If you\u2019re a good guy, then there\u2019s this binding spell that turns <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/2017\/06\/22\/five-count-ramifications-awful-finishes-womens-revolution-styles-nakamura-mike-maria-title-prestige\/\" title=\"FIVE COUNT: Ramifications of awful finishes, Women&#8217;s Revolution, Styles-Nakamura, Mike &#038; Maria, Title Prestige\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":36693,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","podmotor_file_id":"","podmotor_episode_id":"","cover_image":"","cover_image_id":"","duration":"","filesize":"","filesize_raw":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","itunes_episode_number":"","itunes_title":"","itunes_season_number":"","itunes_episode_type":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,52,4366,27],"tags":[90,467,954,5390,308,4951],"class_list":["post-44010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-spotlightarticles","category-opnionandanalysis","category-five-count","category-specialists","tag-aj-styles","tag-charlotte","tag-maria-kanellis","tag-mike-kanellis","tag-shinsuke-nakamura","tag-womens-revolution"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/post\/2016\/12\/NakamuraShinsukeBeaven3x2_600.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44010"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44010\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44050,"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44010\/revisions\/44050"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36693"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pwtorch.com\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}