Torch Feedback
Raw Ratings Reax #4: " McMahon's character is annoying, petty, and vindictive, and so is he in real life."
Oct 11, 2007 - 2:14:25 AM |
|
Kevin: Once upon a time Raw was a "do not miss show." This is not the situation any more. Cena was shoved down our throats, Hornswaggle was the love child, Triple H is superman and is destroying and has destroyed almost every wrestler on the roster, Mr. Kennedy is jobbing every week, ECW has been destroyed, Big Daddy V is prancing around on my TV without a shirt and for no reason involved in the ECW main event on a pay-per-view, cock jokes, Carlito and Benjamin the list goes on of wrestlers that CAN wrestle and are not in main events or decent programs, if you are not related or married to a the boss's daughter then you are not pushed on the show. Why do I want to watch anymore? Vince does not care what I want to see. My choice of what I want to see is not just mine; people have saying it for two years during every match that Cena wrestled, but I guess if "You Suck" means that you are going to get the push of your life. Well guess what, Vince? Your product sucks. I want to see Mr Kennedy, Hardy, Flair. Carlito, a decent tag team division, Intercontinental division, even women's division not boobs but someone with talent, not Triple H "hulking up" - that is so '80s - and destroying all of your talent. I really was counting on the love child story to be big, but it ended up really really small and that is too bad because it just cemented the direction that Raw has taken. They stink, plain and simple.
Nick Vincent of Round Rock, Tex: Others have already articulated why Raw ratings are down, so instead let's go right for the throat with some radical proposals. First, McMahon needs to swallow his pride and take his upcoming Congressional ass-whooping like a man. Admit you were wrong, promise to clean up WWE, and mean it. And then go away. Your character is annoying, petty, and vindictive, and so are you in real life. We don't want to see that stupid strut every week, as you remind us for the 4,798th time that you're the boss. We're sick of all stories and matches revolving around you, who pissed you off and who you want to punish. Your immediate banishment from TV would solve a lot of problems. Next, kill off ECW, since you've royally screwed it up anyway. Then cut loose the dead wood from all three shows (and there's a lot) and consolidate to a leaner, smaller talent pool. Add in a few new faces - steal from TNA, go to the indy leagues. I don't care. Find them. Let a newly shaken-up roster fight it out to see what new stars emerge. Lose the skits. Lose the Divas. Unify the WWE/World titles, and both tag titles. Go to two shows a week. This would be a good start. Of course, you won't listen. You're arrogant. So I'll just wave bye-bye as the good ship WWE continues to sink.
Frank Hyden: I believe that one of the reason that Raw's ratings were so low is because of the great and dramatic (if extremely sloppily played) Monday Night Football game. I don't think there was much channel-changing in a game like that. Not that I think the MNF game was the sole reason for the low ratings, but I do think it was a contributing factor.
Steve H of California: There are a lot of reasons Raw's ratings are down. Basically, the shows just are not interesting. Way too much backstage stuff that's boring. Not enough actual wrestling. I DVR all the wrestling shows and just flip through them now. It saves me time because there's not much that interests me. I used to be one of those fans who watched everything. My friend and I would get together to watch the shows. Now, there's just nothing that compelling. You don't get that feeling that "anything can happen." It's more like, nothing will happen. Let these guys go out there and do their thing in the ring and on the mic and see what happens. Build up your mid-card talent. Bring in more jobbers for TV and save your big stars mostly for PPV. And let's have one tag team title and either the U.S. Title or I.C. Title, not both. Keep your divas on one show and your cruiserweights on another. Actually, get rid of the Cruiserweight Title and make it a TV Title for ECW. Better yet, let's just get rid of ECW all together. Better than all of that, put the brands back together. That's what really needs to be done in my opinion.
Want your voice to be heard inside of WWE headquarters tomorrow morning? Or in TNA headquarters? This is the independent site many people in both groups read to gauge fan feedback. We still welcome your 1-10 score and comments. To contribute your thoughts on Raw Ratings, click here. Please keep your thoughts to around 10-15 lines if possible to increase your odds of being published.
PWTORCH FORMAT CONVENTIONS
For the sake of clarity to our readers (and to save us time editing these same things over and over), please follow these simple conventions when writing Torch Reax:
-Wrestlers teaming together should be connected with "&" symbol (e.g. Hunter & Michaels, Devon & Ray) or with a "/" (e.g. Animal/Hawk, Harris/Storm), but not dashes and not the word "and."
-To designate wrestlers who are fighting, feuding, or wrestling each other, put a dash (-) between them (e.g. Michaels-McMahon, Jarrett-Sting, Hogan-Andre) or use "vs."
-The word versus should always be abbreviated this way: "vs." with a period afterward (not "v." or "v/s" or "VS" or "VS." or any other way).
-Plus, it's just our policy, but we don't indulge wrestling promotions' strange spelling fetishes where they spell Raw, Smackdown, Heat, Impact, etc. with the haphazard capitalization of various leTTeRz. It seems very "junior high," so no Raw (it's Raw), no iMPACT (it's Impact), etc.
-Please try to avoid overuse of dot-dot-dots. If you have a thought that's "trailing off," you can use for effect, but otherwise, just use periods, commas, and our personal favorite, semicolons if you dare. We have always had a policy of only one exclamation point and no ALL CAPS. Let your words convey the meaning of your point. There's many to choose from out there.
Send feedback on this article to pwtorch@gmail.com and we'll regularly publish reader feedback in the "Torch Feedback" category on the Main Listing.
For more BREAKING NEWS on WWE, TNA!
VISIT OUR AFFILIATE -
PROWRESTLING.NET
For UFC & MMA NEWS & BLOGS:
VISIT OUR SISTER SITE - MMATORCH.COM
Upgrade to PWTORCH VIP: DETAILS & SIGN-UP INFO
| MORE "Torch Feedback" ARTICLES
|
| WWE PPV Price Increase Reax #1: Outrage expressed over WWE's latest PPV price raise - could the backlash cause WWE to second-guess decision? |
| TNA Impact Reax #3: "The build for the PPV matches somehow featured Hulk Hogan despite him yet to show up on TV" |
| TNA Impact Reax #2: "I'm tired of non-stop talking. This isn't a Broadway play; it's professional wrestling and the best stories are told in the ring" |
| Thursday Night TV Reax #1: "I feel anything TNA does right is inevitably drowned out by what they fail at" |
| ECW TV Reax #1: "William Regal has stepped up big time since coming to ECW and he deserves a World Title run" |
| WWE Raw Reax #2: "The major flaw of this show was the real lack of hype for Survivor Series" |
| WWE Raw Reax #1: "The main event commentary was hilarious with Triple H and HBK making fun of Vince, but DX has run its course..." |
| WWE Smackdown Reax #1: "Batista plays the perfect bully and Rey plays the perfect hero; this is a chance to make Batista the lead heel on Smackdown" |
| TNA Impact Reax #2: "Hogan, as great as he was, is 15 years beyond his prime and he signed with a company touting their so-called youth movement" |
| WWE Superstars Reax #1: "It's time for Cryme Tyme or The Hart Dynasty to go after that tag team championship, and please stop feuding" |
| TNA Impact Reax #1: "The episode-long Hogan build-up made me think that I shouldn't care about anything else on the show" |
| TORCH READER ALERT: Did you watch TNA Impact featuring Hulk Hogan? Send your feedback on the show |
| ECW TV Reax #1: "William Regal is as good as it gets whether he's portraying comedy, disgust, pompousness, or pure insanity!" |
| WWE Raw Reax #3: "Does Randy Orton's car now qualify WWE to get a Cash for Clunkers rebate?" |
| WWE Raw Reax #2: "Just like TNA, we have the same problem of a three-way title match where the two opponents didn't earn a title shot" |
| WWE Raw Reax #1: "Finally, a noteworthy episode of Raw with actual storyline progression – a rare treat!" |
| WWE Bragging Rights PPV Reax #3: "Obviously the Big Show doesn't care about brand supremacy any more than I do" |
| WWE Bragging Rights PPV Reax #2: "The image of Orton hunched over a control panel with an evil glare on his face and his finger on the big red button was priceless" |
| WWE Bragging Rights PPV Reax #1: "The show wasn't really bad, just didn't seem important. It didn't feel like a special show..." |
| WWE Smackdown Reax #1: "The opening promo was good to introduce the Smackdown 7 ... only to kill momentum by having the entire non-captain group switched" |
(c) 1999-2009 TDH Communications Inc. - All rights reserved. |