|
WWE Raw Reax #3: "Shawn, not only take Flair out of his misery, but take me out of my misery of this totally unbelievable angle."
Mar 25, 2008 - 2:58:21 PM |
Scott Palmer of Northville, Mich. (8.5): Best segment: Ric Flair and Shawn Michaels, by far. Worst. Bunny segment. All I'll say is that the only match that I am really looking forward to is involving an old man, and an even older man. But that's what compelling TV will do! You give two people mic time and let them work their magic, instead of some boring scripted promo, and guess what happens... you sell tickets! I bet anything WrestleMania does a good buyrate based on that match alone. And one of the guys can barely work anymore! The triple threat - I feel like I've been there, and I don't really care. Edge and Undertaker is basically whatever. Money in the Bank could be fun. Bunnyville or whatever it is is when my remote goes to "Law and Order." I hope that the crowd goes absolutely nuts for Flair vs. Michaels, and craps all over the "main event." Maybe, now just maybe, this will convince Vince that you don't give wrestlers scripts! If you give them bulletpoints and let them work our the rough spots in the house shows, Iguarantee you can find the next Steve Austin.
Terrie Neilson of Las Vegas, Nev. (8.5): Best: Flair-Michaels exchange. Worst: The Great Khali vs. Hardcore Holly. Solid Raw going into Wrestlemania, but I fear it may be too little too late. Without taking my picky brain to it, the show didn't drag very much, though the replays started to grate on me some (like doubles of Vince-Flair). The crowd responded well to the night's activities, save for a few lulls (Khali-Holly). Overall, I was very entertained. With the picky brain on, the opening segment was really good, but at first I was wondering why Flair-Michaels wasn't a part of it since the two would be in the main event. They would get their own chance to shine - and did they ever - but it was baited a little bit when it was plugged that Flair was going to address Shawn "next"... only to wait after neaer ten minutes of commercials, yet another video for the rudderless Show-Mayweather match, the useless Khali squash of Holly, and the second play of Vince-Flair. The delivery was a work of art, but once again the bloody Smackdown beatdown was left out of the conversation, which would have given Shawn the motive to be concerned for Flair's safety against Vince last week. Shawn's heelish statement, phrased a little more creatively, felt like deja vu all over again: the younger heel taking the old man face out to pasture. There were ways to stay away from even the slightest breath of "lather-rinse-repeat" cycle the Flair retirement storyline, but alas WWE went to the comfort zone again. The main event felt a little staged, but the no-DQ rules allowed for the interference and brawls that took place, and, for once, didn't leave much in the way of forgone conclusions. Even the Flair-Michaels parting seconds were even (Flair low-blows Michaels after Michaels prevents a figure-four and tries to win seeming the same way). The closest to predictability we have is that Flair has probably won his last match, as he got the duke against Randy Orton. And in the Carolinas, no less.
Brian Rathjen of Eldridge, Iowa: For what I saw, it was a pretty good show. Sure, the intergender match wasn't much, but then again, it was more par for the course. The highlight was the promo between Shawn Michaels and Ric Flair. Flair still has it, and his victory over a top-shelf opponent such as Randy Orton proves he can compete with the best of today's young stars. Even if Flair retires from active competition, here's hoping he remains involved, in some capacity, in wrestling.
John Turenne of Honolulu, Hawaii (7.0): The writing team hit a homerun with opening segment allowing the major players to get equal mic time showing why their respective matches at WrestleMania are of importance. The buyrates will increase on this segment alone. But why is Paul LeVesques's character constantly portrayed as the champion instead of the challenger? He gets the final word/rebuttal and has the last of the ring entrances. His whole role reeks of nepotism. No one on the current roster stands a chance as long as this arrogant a--hole remains active. Why am I the only one who thinks the whole angle involving Ric Flair is a complete joke? He is coasting on his past accomplishments and the accolades from the locker room. He deserves the respect, but I'm sorry. I'm a huge mark of Ric Flair of years ago going back to the Georgia Championship Wrestling days. But this incarnation of a washed up, desperate, crazy, crybaby tarnishes his reputation in my eyes. Yes, Ric, you won the NWA Title in 1981. But the Nature Boy back then would be ashamed, embarrassed, and pissed off at the shell of the "Man" you've become today. Shawn, not only take Flair out of his misery, but take me out of my misery of this totally unbelievable angle. Paul Wight's Big Show has handled his role admirably. His video of his match preparation was well done. Sure, in all likelihood he should squash that punk Floyd Mayweather. But I am actually intrigued with this match most of all on the card. It was hurt, however, without Mayweather live on the show for one last push before WrestleMania. I've always been in J.R.'s corner, but now believe 2008 should be the swan song of his illustrious career. He is now missing calls and wrestlers names and it will only get worse. Like Flair, the Jerry Lawler of the past would kick the ass of pathetic, perverted pansy that has become of the King today. 2009 is time for new blood for the announce team if creative doesn't drop the ball like they did with Joey Styles. Hey, does anybody wonder why the usually classy forty-something Lillian Garcia always tries to dress like the usually trashy twenty-something Britney Spears?
We welcome your 1-10 score and comments on this show for a "Raw Reax" feature in the Torch Feedback section of PWTorch.com. Just to add a twist to this feature, include not just your hometown, but also your occupation (mechanic, lawyer, stay-at-home-dad, college student, etc.) so readers get a flavor for what everyone does as "day jobs." To contribute your thoughts on Raw, click here.
Send feedback on this article to pwtorch@gmail.com and we'll regularly publish reader feedback in the "Torch Feedback" category on the Main Listing.
For more BREAKING NEWS on WWE, TNA...
VISIT OUR AFFILIATE -
PROWRESTLING.NET
For UFC & MMA NEWS & BLOGS:
VISIT OUR SISTER SITE - MMATORCH.COM
Upgrade to PWTorch VIP:
DETAILS & SIGN-UP INFO (rates now as low as $2.99/month)
| More Recent Torch Feedback Articles |
 Monday Night Reax #4: "One word summarizes this week's Raw: focus" |
| Monday Night Reax #3: "I don't need to see The Nasty Boys or Jimmy Hart wrestling in 2010" |
| Monday Night Reax #2: "I want to be entertained and I want TNA to succeed, but this was bad" |
| WWE Raw Reax #1: "Austin showed more charisma than the rest of the roster combined before even opening his mouth" |
| WWE NXT Reax #2: "Slater & Christian could one day re-create the magic of Edge & Christian" |
| Monday Night Reax #6: "There is so much potential in TNA with RVD, Hardy, and Styles" |
| WWE NXT Reax #1: "All of the rookies were outstanding in their roles on the show tonight" |
| Monday Night Reax #5: "Raw was good, but it felt like nothing much really happened" |
| Monday Night Reax #4: "I'm hoping TNA pairs Beer Money with A.J. Styles & Flair to re-create the Horsemen" |
| Monday Night Reax #3: "Fans switching over to Impact discovered TNA has blood - grotesque buckets of it" |
| Monday Night Reax #2: "TNA had WWE beat, then TNA went for the knockout with...Brooke Hogan" |
| Monday Night Reax #1: "I believe Ric Flair is going wrestle all the way until the day he dies" |
| TNA Impact Reax #2: "TNA got it backwards with Ric Flair and A.J. Styles" |
| Thursday Night TV Reax #1: "Flair-Hogan is more intriguing to me than Hart-McMahon" |
| NXT Reax #2: "There are so many questions to be answered, but we wouldn't be asking them if we didn't care" |
| NXT Reax #1: "With Jericho, Punk, and Regal on the same hour, WWE has effectively put their best actors on one show" |
| WWE Raw Reax #4: "I continue to be appalled by the Bret-Vince build-up, but for different reasons than most would think" |
| WWE Raw Reax #3: "For some reason, this Bret-Vince can't-miss historic angle is missing the mark" |
| WWE Raw Reax #2: "I don't understand the positive feedback for the Batista and Cena exchange" |
| WWE Raw Reax #1: "Everything was a Home Run or a wildly-flailing strikeout with almost nothing in between" |
(c) 1999-2010 TDH Communications Inc. - All rights reserved. |
